takeOneMVar?

Alexander Kjeldaas alexander.kjeldaas at gmail.com
Fri Feb 15 09:09:45 CET 2013


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Edward Z. Yang <ezyang at mit.edu> wrote:

> Apologies for the kibitzing.
>
>
If anyone, it's me proposing weird stuff :-)


>  > -- This will fail if the MVarGroup is not associated with the current
> > process (if the MVarGroup's TSO is not the current TSO)!
>
> I'm not super keen about this requirement. What if I want to create an
> MVarGroup
> but pass it to another thread?
>
>
Our emails crossed each other :-).  As you can see, I think this is
solvable.

Alexander


> Edward
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130215/eb1b9ca1/attachment.htm>


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list