nofib regressions in HEAD since 7.6.2 release
Simon Marlow
marlowsd at gmail.com
Tue Feb 12 12:09:23 CET 2013
On 12/02/13 03:17, Johan Tibell wrote:
> Hi Nicolas!
>
> I tried to reproduce the difference between 7.0.4 and 7.6.2 on the
> exp3_8, wheel-sieve1, and primes and couldn't get the same percent
> difference as you. We need to reconcile these differences somehow. Lets
> start with more exact machine specs. I have a:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed TotalMem
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> bernouilli +3.3% +0.2% 0.12 0.13 +0.0%
> exp3_8 +1.1% +53.7% 0.14 0.14 +300.0%
> gen_regexps +18.7% +3.9% 0.00 0.00 +0.0%
> integrate -0.1% +39.0% 0.21 0.23 +0.0%
> kahan +1.7% +98.6% +9.9% +7.3% +0.0%
> paraffins +1.3% -1.2% 0.06 0.08 +0.0%
> primes +1.4% +64.7% 0.04 0.05 +50.0%
> queens +0.8% -0.5% 0.02 0.02 +0.0%
> rfib +1.7% +42.8% 0.02 0.02 +0.0%
> tak +0.9% +12.0% 0.01 0.01 +0.0%
> wheel-sieve1 +0.8% +66.6% -4.6% -5.8% -12.5%
> wheel-sieve2 +0.9% +0.0% 0.12 0.13 +0.0%
> x2n1 +10.3% +87.3% 0.00 0.01 +200.0%
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Min -0.1% -1.2% -4.6% -5.8% -12.5%
> Max +18.7% +98.6% +9.9% +7.3% +300.0%
> Geometric Mean +3.2% +31.7% +2.4% +0.5% +23.6%
Some of these benchmarks essentially do no allocation in their inner
loops (x2nl, rfib, tak), so differences there just indicate changes in
the IO library or elsewhere, and aren't significant.
Is your 7.6.2 from our binary distributions, or did you build it yourself?
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list