Validate failures
José Pedro Magalhães
jpm at cs.uu.nl
Thu Feb 7 11:34:51 CET 2013
For what it's worth, I got these failures with sh validate --fast in HEAD
this morning:
Unexpected failures:
../../libraries/directory/tests getPermissions001 [bad stdout] (normal)
perf/compiler T1969 [stat too good] (normal)
perf/compiler T3294 [stat not good enough] (normal)
perf/compiler T4801 [stat not good enough] (normal)
perf/compiler T783 [stat not good enough] (normal)
perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat not good enough]
(normal)
perf/haddock haddock.base [stat not good enough]
(normal)
perf/haddock haddock.compiler [stat too good]
(normal)
perf/should_run Conversions [stat not good enough]
(normal)
perf/should_run T4830 [stat too good] (normal)
perf/should_run T5536 [stat too good] (normal)
perf/should_run T7436 [stat too good] (normal)
perf/should_run lazy-bs-alloc [stat too good] (normal)
simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
But then again, looking at it, I'm not sure what to do about the perf ones.
Should
we be more flexible in the expected result, or should I have fewer
expectations
about my machine being representative?
And getPermissions001 might or might not have to do with the fact that this
is on
a virtual machine...
Cheers,
Pedro
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Simon Marlow <marlowsd at gmail.com> wrote:
> These are still failing, BTW.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> On 01/02/13 14:51, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>
>> yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday
>>
>> | -----Original Message-----
>> | From: ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@**
>> haskell.org <ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org>] On
>> | Behalf Of Simon Marlow
>> | Sent: 01 February 2013 08:57
>> | To: ghc-devs at haskell.org
>> | Subject: Validate failures
>> |
>> | A batch of testsuite failures this morning - forgotten push to
>> testsuite
>> | perhaps?
>> |
>> | Unexpected failures:
>> | perf/should_run T5113 [stat not good enough] (normal)
>> | simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
>> | simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
>> | simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
>> | simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
>> | typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal)
>> | typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
>> | typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
>> |
>> | Cheers,
>> | Simon
>> |
>> | ______________________________**_________________
>> | ghc-devs mailing list
>> | ghc-devs at haskell.org
>> | http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130207/92b57a9e/attachment.htm>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list