From carter.schonwald at gmail.com Sat Sep 18 16:23:13 2021 From: carter.schonwald at gmail.com (Carter Schonwald) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 12:23:13 -0400 Subject: [GHC DevOps Group] The future of Phabricator In-Reply-To: <665a82c0-5223-5cff-e990-684a09fc52f2@nh2.me> References: <87zhuw2fw2.fsf@smart-cactus.org> <665a82c0-5223-5cff-e990-684a09fc52f2@nh2.me> Message-ID: In one sense our migration was prescient, on the other hand i really wish gitlab had a more performant code review ux. Are there any performant for large code review tools? I find the reload rendering latency and auto collapse defaults in gitlab pretty painful and I’m pretty ignorant of the land scape these days. On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:27 PM Niklas Hambüchen via ghc-devs < ghc-devs at haskell.org> wrote: > For those interested: > > Three years later, Phabricator shut down. > > May 29, 2021: > > https://admin.phacility.com/phame/post/view/11/phacility_is_winding_down_operations/ > > On 10/30/18 5:54 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: > > For one, at this point we have no options for support in the event that > > something goes wrong as the company responsible for Phabricator, > > Phacility, has closed their support channels to non-paying customers. > > Furthermore, in the past year or two Phacility has been placing their > > development resources in the parts their customers pay them for, which > > appear to be much different that the parts that we actively use. For > > this reason, some parts that we rely on seem oddly half-finished. > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs at haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: