[GHC DevOps Group] CircleCI question
Mateusz Kowalczyk
fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk
Thu Nov 23 19:27:09 UTC 2017
Hi Ben,
Jonas is on holiday until Monday so his reachability is limited. Having
said that…
On 11/23/2017 06:45 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
> I'm hoping that you can perhaps shed light on the status of this build
> [1] as the interface is a bit perplexing. All at once the interface
> suggests that:
>
> * The build has "failed" and finished 23 minutes ago
>
> * "There was an issue while running this container and it was rerun."
> Note the use of past tense, perhaps
> suggesting that the build was rerun and finished? The second sentence
> is quite mysterious; is the "most recent run" the failed run or the
>
> * "The most recent run is shown." Presumably this is the re-run.
>
> * The build is still running.
>
> I honestly am not sure what I am supposed to do with information.
> It sounds as though there was an infrastructure issue on their end,
> causing the last attempted build to fail and resulting in a rerun, which
> is still ongoing. However, the email notification they sent claimed that
> there was an unexpected exit code (seemingly during the test step):
I had a ticket about this with CircleCI. They have told me after a
week-ish that it was fixed on their end and I did not see any new builds
with this problem. Perhaps it's a regression. The ticket number in their
system is 26023. Should I raise a new one or you want to?
> ------
> Failed
> ------
>
> Uh-oh, this build did not succeed!
>
> ...
>
> ----------------
> Failing command:
> ----------------
> Command: Error executing build steps
> Exit code: n/a
>
> ------
> Output
> ------
> Unexpected error running build task: exit status 255
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> The rest of your commands were successful
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Spin up Environment
> Checkout code
> prepare-system
> submodules
> Boot
> Configure
> Build
>
> In general I'm a bit confused as to why they are notifying us of
> spurious build failures.
>
> Have you seen this sort of behavior before? Does the above
> interpretation sound correct? Is there any way to reduce the volume of
> notifications to *only* actual failed builds?
I'm not sure about notifications.
> Cheers,
>
> - Ben
>
>
> [1] https://circleci.com/gh/ghc/ghc/389
> Screenshot here: http://home.smart-cactus.org/~ben/circleci.png
>
--
Mateusz K.
More information about the Ghc-devops-group
mailing list