[Git][ghc/ghc][wip/marge_bot_batch_merge_job] 8 commits: JS: fake support for native adjustors (#25159)
Marge Bot (@marge-bot)
gitlab at gitlab.haskell.org
Mon Sep 9 19:30:32 UTC 2024
Marge Bot pushed to branch wip/marge_bot_batch_merge_job at Glasgow Haskell Compiler / GHC
Commits:
03055c71 by Sylvain Henry at 2024-09-09T14:58:15-04:00
JS: fake support for native adjustors (#25159)
The JS backend doesn't support adjustors (I believe) and in any case if
it ever supports them it will be a native support, not one via libffi.
- - - - -
5bf0e6bc by Sylvain Henry at 2024-09-09T14:58:56-04:00
JS: remove redundant h$lstat
It was introduced a second time by mistake in
27dceb42376c34b99a38e36a33b2abc346ed390f (cf #25190)
- - - - -
dd9e89cb by Simon Peyton Jones at 2024-09-09T15:30:13-04:00
Refactor only newSysLocalDs
* Change newSysLocalDs to take a scaled type
* Add newSysLocalMDs that takes a type and makes a ManyTy local
Lots of files touched, nothing deep.
- - - - -
bb94b0a9 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2024-09-09T15:30:13-04:00
Don't introduce 'nospec' on the LHS of a RULE
This patch address #25160. The main payload is:
* When desugaring the LHS of a RULE, do not introduce the `nospec` call
for non-canonical evidence. See GHC.Core.InstEnv
Note [Coherence and specialisation: overview]
The `nospec` call usually introdued in `dsHsWrapper`, but we don't want it
on the LHS of a RULE (that's what caused #25160). So now `dsHsWrapper` takes
a flag to say if it's on the LHS of a RULE. See wrinkle (NC1) in
`Note [Desugaring non-canonical evidence]` in GHC.HsToCore.Binds.
But I think this flag will go away again when I have finished with my
(entirely separate) speciaise-on-values patch (#24359).
All this meant I had to re-understand the `nospec` stuff and coherence, and
that in turn made me do some refactoring, and add a lot of new documentation
The big change is that in GHC.Core.InstEnv, I changed
the /type synonym/ `Canonical` into
a /data type/ `CanonicalEvidence`
and documented it a lot better.
That in turn made me realise that CalLStacks were being treated with a
bit of a hack, which I documented in `Note [CallStack and ExecptionContext hack]`.
- - - - -
2a7d5a33 by Simon Peyton Jones at 2024-09-09T15:30:14-04:00
Add defaulting of equalities
This MR adds one new defaulting strategy to the top-level
defaulting story: see Note [Defaulting equalities] in GHC.Tc.Solver.
This resolves #25029 and #25125, which showed that users were
accidentally relying on a GHC bug, which was fixed by
commit 04f5bb85c8109843b9ac2af2a3e26544d05e02f4
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simon.peytonjones at gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jun 12 17:44:59 2024 +0100
Fix untouchability test
This MR fixes #24938. The underlying problem was tha the test for
"does this implication bring in scope any equalities" was plain wrong.
This fix gave rise to a number of user complaints; but the improved
defaulting story of this MR largely resolves them.
On the way I did a bit of refactoring, of course
* Completely restructure the extremely messy top-level defaulting
code. The new code is in GHC.Tc.Solver.tryDefaulting, and is much,
much, much esaier to grok.
- - - - -
df6a6e5b by Andrzej Rybczak at 2024-09-09T15:30:19-04:00
Don't name a binding pattern
It's a keyword when PatternSynonyms are set.
- - - - -
19d8909f by Simon Peyton Jones at 2024-09-09T15:30:20-04:00
Do not use an error thunk for an absent dictionary
In worker/wrapper we were using an error thunk for an absent dictionary,
but that works very badly for -XDictsStrict, or even (as #24934 showed)
in some complicated cases involving strictness analysis and unfoldings.
This MR just uses RubbishLit for dictionaries. Simple.
No test case, sadly because our only repro case is rather complicated.
- - - - -
0b9cdbab by Hécate Kleidukos at 2024-09-09T15:30:25-04:00
haddock: Remove support for applehelp format in the Manual
- - - - -
30 changed files:
- compiler/GHC/Core/InstEnv.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/CallerCC/Types.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Arrows.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Binds.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Expr.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Foreign/C.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Foreign/Call.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Foreign/JavaScript.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Foreign/Wasm.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/ListComp.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Monad.hs
- compiler/GHC/HsToCore/Utils.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Errors.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Gen/Splice.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Instance/Class.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Dict.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Equality.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Irred.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Monad.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Solve.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/TyCl/Instance.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Types/Evidence.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/Instantiate.hs
- compiler/GHC/Tc/Utils/Unify.hs
- libraries/ghc-internal/jsbits/base.js
- m4/ghc_adjustors_method.m4
- testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple14.hs
- − testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple14.stderr
The diff was not included because it is too large.
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/38b0927bd76f835abe3646450a2aa9116b5d5b9a...0b9cdbab4c6882ac1da6bbaacb4c9249b6c0d27a
--
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/compare/38b0927bd76f835abe3646450a2aa9116b5d5b9a...0b9cdbab4c6882ac1da6bbaacb4c9249b6c0d27a
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/attachments/20240909/6eab0f60/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-commits
mailing list