[Git][ghc/ghc][wip/ghc-9.4.5-backports] Fix void-arg-adding mechanism for worker/wrapper

Zubin (@wz1000) gitlab at gitlab.haskell.org
Tue Apr 11 06:24:08 UTC 2023



Zubin pushed to branch wip/ghc-9.4.5-backports at Glasgow Haskell Compiler / GHC


Commits:
aad62f1f by Simon Peyton Jones at 2023-04-11T11:50:34+05:30
Fix void-arg-adding mechanism for worker/wrapper

As #22725 shows, in worker/wrapper we must add the void argument
/last/, not first.  See GHC.Core.Opt.WorkWrap.Utils
Note [Worker/wrapper needs to add void arg last].

That led me to to study GHC.Core.Opt.SpecConstr
Note [SpecConstr needs to add void args first] which suggests the
opposite!  And indeed I think it's the other way round for SpecConstr
-- or more precisely the void arg must precede the "extra_bndrs".

That led me to some refactoring of GHC.Core.Opt.SpecConstr.calcSpecInfo.

(cherry picked from commit 964284fcab6e27fe2fa5c279ea008551cbc15dbb)

- - - - -


7 changed files:

- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/SpecConstr.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs
- compiler/GHC/Core/Utils.hs
- testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T13143.stderr
- testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T18328.stderr
- + testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T22725.hs
- testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/all.T


Changes:

=====================================
compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/SpecConstr.hs
=====================================
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ import GHC.Unit.Module.ModGuts
 
 import GHC.Types.Literal ( litIsLifted )
 import GHC.Types.Id
+import GHC.Types.Id.Make ( voidArgId, voidPrimId )
 import GHC.Types.Var.Env
 import GHC.Types.Var.Set
 import GHC.Types.Name
@@ -1741,24 +1742,13 @@ spec_one env fn arg_bndrs body (call_pat, rule_number)
 --        return ()
 
                 -- And build the results
-        ; let spec_body_ty   = exprType spec_body
-              (spec_lam_args1, spec_sig, spec_arity1, spec_join_arity1)
-                  = calcSpecInfo fn call_pat extra_bndrs
-                  -- Annotate the variables with the strictness information from
-                  -- the function (see Note [Strictness information in worker binders])
-              add_void_arg = needsVoidWorkerArg fn arg_bndrs spec_lam_args1
-              (spec_lam_args, spec_call_args, spec_arity, spec_join_arity)
-                  | add_void_arg
-                  -- See Note [SpecConst needs to add void args first]
-                  , (spec_lam_args, spec_call_args, _) <- addVoidWorkerArg spec_lam_args1 []
-                      -- needsVoidWorkerArg: usual w/w hack to avoid generating
-                      -- a spec_rhs of unlifted type and no args.
-                  , !spec_arity      <- spec_arity1 + 1
-                  , !spec_join_arity <- fmap (+ 1) spec_join_arity1
-                  = (spec_lam_args,  spec_call_args, spec_arity,  spec_join_arity)
-                  | otherwise
-                  = (spec_lam_args1, spec_lam_args1, spec_arity1, spec_join_arity1)
+        ; let spec_body_ty = exprType spec_body
+              (spec_lam_args, spec_call_args, spec_sig)
+                  = calcSpecInfo fn arg_bndrs call_pat extra_bndrs
 
+              spec_arity = count isId spec_lam_args
+              spec_join_arity | isJoinId fn = Just (length spec_call_args)
+                              | otherwise   = Nothing
               spec_id    = asWorkerLikeId $
                            mkLocalId spec_name Many
                                      (mkLamTypes spec_lam_args spec_body_ty)
@@ -1768,13 +1758,9 @@ spec_one env fn arg_bndrs body (call_pat, rule_number)
                              `setIdArity`     spec_arity
                              `asJoinId_maybe` spec_join_arity
 
-                -- Conditionally use result of new worker-wrapper transform
-              spec_rhs   = mkLams spec_lam_args (mkSeqs cbv_args spec_body_ty spec_body)
-              rule_rhs = mkVarApps (Var spec_id) $
-                              -- This will give us all the arguments we quantify over
-                              -- in the rule plus the void argument if present
-                              -- since `length(qvars) + void + length(extra_bndrs) = length spec_call_args`
-                              dropTail (length extra_bndrs) spec_call_args
+        -- Conditionally use result of new worker-wrapper transform
+              spec_rhs = mkLams spec_lam_args (mkSeqs cbv_args spec_body_ty spec_body)
+              rule_rhs = mkVarApps (Var spec_id) spec_call_args
               inline_act = idInlineActivation fn
               this_mod   = sc_module env
               rule       = mkRule this_mod True {- Auto -} True {- Local -}
@@ -1814,64 +1800,122 @@ mkSeqs seqees res_ty rhs =
         = rhs
 
 
-{- Note [SpecConst needs to add void args first]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+{- Note [SpecConstr void argument insertion]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Consider a function
+    f :: Bool -> forall t. blah
     f start @t = e
 We want to specialize for a partially applied call `f True`.
 See also Note [SpecConstr call patterns], second Wrinkle.
 Naively we would expect to get
+    $sf :: forall t. blah
     $sf @t = $se
     RULE: f True = $sf
-The specialized function only takes a single type argument
-so we add a void argument to prevent it from turning into
-a thunk. See Note [Protecting the last value argument] for details
-why. Normally we would add the void argument after the
-type argument giving us:
+The specialized function only takes a single type argument so we add a
+void argument to prevent it from turning into a thunk. See Note
+[Protecting the last value argument] for details why. Normally we
+would add the void argument after the type argument giving us:
+
     $sf :: forall t. Void# -> bla
     $sf @t void = $se
     RULE: f True = $sf void# (wrong)
-But if you look closely this wouldn't typecheck!
-If we substitute `f True` with `$sf void#` we expect the type argument to be applied first
-but we apply void# first.
-The easist fix seems to be just to add the void argument to the front of the arguments.
-Now we get:
+
+But if you look closely this wouldn't typecheck!  If we substitute `f
+True` with `$sf void#` we expect the type argument to be applied first
+but we apply void# first.  The easiest fix seems to be just to add the
+void argument to the front of the arguments.  Now we get:
+
     $sf :: Void# -> forall t. bla
     $sf void @t = $se
     RULE: f True = $sf void#
+
 And now we can substitute `f True` with `$sf void#` with everything working out nicely!
+
+More precisely, in `calcSpecInfo`
+(i)  we need the void arg to /precede/ the `extra_bndrs`, but
+(ii) it must still /follow/ `qvar_bndrs`.
+
+Example to illustrate (ii):
+  f :: forall r (a :: TYPE r). Bool -> a
+  f = /\r. /\(a::TYPE r). \b. body
+
+  {- Specialise for f _ _ True -}
+
+  $sf :: forall r (a :: TYPE r). Void# -> a
+  $sf = /\r. /\(a::TYPE r). \v. body[True/b]
+  RULE: forall r (a :: TYPE r). f @r @a True = $sf @r @a void#
+
+The void argument must follow the foralls, lest the forall be
+ill-kinded.  See Note [Worker/wrapper needs to add void arg last] in
+GHC.Core.Opt.WorkWrap.Utils.
+
+Note [generaliseDictPats]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Consider these two rules (#21831, item 2):
+  RULE "SPEC:foo"  forall d1 d2. foo @Int @Integer d1 d2 = $sfoo1
+  RULE "SC:foo"    forall a. foo @Int @a $fNumInteger = $sfoo2 @a
+The former comes from the type class specialiser, the latter from SpecConstr.
+Note that $fNumInteger is a top-level binding for Num Integer.
+
+The trouble is that neither is more general than the other.  In a call
+   (foo @Int @Integer $fNumInteger d)
+it isn't clear which rule to fire.
+
+The trouble is that the SpecConstr rule fires on a /specific/ dict, $fNumInteger,
+but actually /could/ fire regardless.  That is, it could be
+  RULE "SC:foo"    forall a d. foo @Int @a d = $sfoo2 @a
+
+Now, it is clear that SPEC:foo is more specific.  But GHC can't tell
+that, because SpecConstr doesn't know that dictionary arguments are
+singleton types!  So generaliseDictPats teaches it this fact.  It
+spots such patterns (using typeDeterminesValue), and quantifies over
+the dictionary.  Now we get
+
+  RULE "SC:foo"    forall a d. foo @Int @a d = $sfoo2 @a
+
+And /now/ "SPEC:foo" is clearly more specific: we can instantiate the new
+"SC:foo" to match the (prefix of) "SPEC:foo".
 -}
 
-calcSpecInfo :: Id                     -- The original function
-             -> CallPat                -- Call pattern
-             -> [Var]                  -- Extra bndrs
-             -> ( [Var]                     -- Demand-decorated binders
-                , DmdSig                    -- Strictness of specialised thing
-                , Arity, Maybe JoinArity )  -- Arities of specialised thing
--- Calcuate bits of IdInfo for the specialised function
+calcSpecInfo :: Id           -- The original function
+             -> [InVar]      -- Lambda binders of original RHS
+             -> CallPat      -- Call pattern
+             -> [Var]        -- Extra bndrs
+             -> ( [Var]           -- Demand-decorated lambda binders
+                                  --   for RHS of specialised function
+                , [Var]           -- Args for call site
+                , DmdSig )        -- Strictness of specialised thing
+-- Calculate bits of IdInfo for the specialised function
 -- See Note [Transfer strictness]
 -- See Note [Strictness information in worker binders]
-calcSpecInfo fn (CP { cp_qvars = qvars, cp_args = pats }) extra_bndrs
-  | isJoinId fn    -- Join points have strictness and arity for LHS only
-  = ( bndrs_w_dmds
-    , mkClosedDmdSig qvar_dmds div
-    , count isId qvars
-    , Just (length qvars) )
-  | otherwise
-  = ( bndrs_w_dmds
-    , mkClosedDmdSig (qvar_dmds ++ extra_dmds) div
-    , count isId qvars + count isId extra_bndrs
-    , Nothing )
+calcSpecInfo fn arg_bndrs (CP { cp_qvars = qvars, cp_args = pats }) extra_bndrs
+  = ( spec_lam_bndrs_w_dmds
+    , spec_call_args
+    , mkClosedDmdSig [idDemandInfo b | b <- spec_lam_bndrs_w_dmds, isId b] div )
   where
     DmdSig (DmdType _ fn_dmds div) = idDmdSig fn
 
-    val_pats   = filterOut isTypeArg pats -- value args at call sites, used to determine how many demands to drop
-                                          -- from the original functions demand and for setting up dmd_env.
+    val_pats   = filterOut isTypeArg pats
+                 -- Value args at call sites, used to determine how many demands to drop
+                 -- from the original functions demand and for setting up dmd_env.
+    dmd_env    = go emptyVarEnv fn_dmds val_pats
     qvar_dmds  = [ lookupVarEnv dmd_env qv `orElse` topDmd | qv <- qvars, isId qv ]
     extra_dmds = dropList val_pats fn_dmds
 
-    bndrs_w_dmds =  set_dmds qvars       qvar_dmds
-                 ++ set_dmds extra_bndrs extra_dmds
+    -- Annotate the variables with the strictness information from
+    -- the function (see Note [Strictness information in worker binders])
+    qvars_w_dmds          = set_dmds qvars       qvar_dmds
+    extras_w_dmds         = set_dmds extra_bndrs extra_dmds
+    spec_lam_bndrs_w_dmds = final_qvars_w_dmds ++ extras_w_dmds
+
+    (final_qvars_w_dmds, spec_call_args)
+       | needsVoidWorkerArg fn arg_bndrs (qvars ++ extra_bndrs)
+         -- Usual w/w hack to avoid generating
+         -- a spec_rhs of unlifted or ill-kinded type and no args.
+         -- See Note [SpecConstr void argument insertion]
+       = ( qvars_w_dmds ++ [voidArgId], qvars ++ [voidPrimId] )
+       | otherwise
+       = ( qvars_w_dmds,                qvars )
 
     set_dmds :: [Var] -> [Demand] -> [Var]
     set_dmds [] _   = []
@@ -1879,8 +1923,6 @@ calcSpecInfo fn (CP { cp_qvars = qvars, cp_args = pats }) extra_bndrs
     set_dmds (v:vs) ds@(d:ds') | isTyVar v = v                   : set_dmds vs ds
                                | otherwise = setIdDemandInfo v d : set_dmds vs ds'
 
-    dmd_env = go emptyVarEnv fn_dmds val_pats
-
     go :: DmdEnv -> [Demand] -> [CoreExpr] -> DmdEnv
     -- We've filtered out all the type patterns already
     go env (d:ds) (pat : pats)     = go (go_one env d pat) ds pats
@@ -1894,7 +1936,6 @@ calcSpecInfo fn (CP { cp_qvars = qvars, cp_args = pats }) extra_bndrs
       = go env ds args
     go_one env _  _ = env
 
-
 {-
 Note [spec_usg includes rhs_usg]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


=====================================
compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs
=====================================
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ A library for the ``worker\/wrapper'' back-end to the strictness analyser
 
 module GHC.Core.Opt.WorkWrap.Utils
    ( WwOpts(..), initWwOpts, mkWwBodies, mkWWstr, mkWWstr_one
-   , needsVoidWorkerArg, addVoidWorkerArg
+   , needsVoidWorkerArg
    , DataConPatContext(..)
    , UnboxingDecision(..), wantToUnboxArg
    , findTypeShape, IsRecDataConResult(..), isRecDataCon
@@ -387,25 +387,34 @@ We use the state-token type which generates no code.
 -- Note [Preserving float barriers].
 needsVoidWorkerArg :: Id -> [Var] -> [Var] -> Bool
 needsVoidWorkerArg fn_id wrap_args work_args
-  =  not (isJoinId fn_id) && no_value_arg -- See Note [Protecting the last value argument]
-  || needs_float_barrier                  -- See Note [Preserving float barriers]
+  =  thunk_problem         -- See Note [Protecting the last value argument]
+  || needs_float_barrier   -- See Note [Preserving float barriers]
   where
-    no_value_arg        = all (not . isId) work_args
+    -- thunk_problem: see Note [Protecting the last value argument]
+    -- For join points we are only worried about (4), not (1-4).
+    -- And (4) can't happen if (null work_args)
+    --     (We could be more clever, by looking at the result type, but
+    --      this approach is simple and conservative.)
+    thunk_problem | isJoinId fn_id = no_value_arg && not (null work_args)
+                  | otherwise      = no_value_arg
+    no_value_arg = not (any isId work_args)
+
+    -- needs_float_barrier: see Note [Preserving float barriers]
+    needs_float_barrier = wrap_had_barrier && not work_has_barrier
     is_float_barrier v  = isId v && hasNoOneShotInfo (idOneShotInfo v)
     wrap_had_barrier    = any is_float_barrier wrap_args
     work_has_barrier    = any is_float_barrier work_args
-    needs_float_barrier = wrap_had_barrier && not work_has_barrier
 
--- | Inserts a `Void#` arg before the first argument.
---
--- Why as the first argument? See Note [SpecConst needs to add void args first]
--- in SpecConstr.
+-- | Inserts a `Void#` arg as the last argument.
+-- Why last? See Note [Worker/wrapper needs to add void arg last]
 addVoidWorkerArg :: [Var] -> [StrictnessMark]
-                 -> ([Var],     -- Lambda bound args
-                     [Var],     -- Args at call site
-                     [StrictnessMark]) -- cbv semantics for the worker args.
-addVoidWorkerArg work_args cbv_marks
-  = (voidArgId : work_args, voidPrimId:work_args, NotMarkedStrict:cbv_marks)
+                 -> ( [Var]     -- Lambda bound args
+                    , [Var]     -- Args at call site
+                    , [StrictnessMark]) -- str semantics for the worker args
+addVoidWorkerArg work_args str_marks
+  = ( work_args ++ [voidArgId]
+    , work_args ++ [voidPrimId]
+    , str_marks ++ [NotMarkedStrict] )
 
 {-
 Note [Protecting the last value argument]
@@ -413,8 +422,8 @@ Note [Protecting the last value argument]
 If the user writes (\_ -> E), they might be intentionally disallowing
 the sharing of E. Since absence analysis and worker-wrapper are keen
 to remove such unused arguments, we add in a void argument to prevent
-the function from becoming a thunk.  Three reasons why turning a function
-into a thunk might be bad:
+the function from becoming a thunk.  Here are several reasons why turning
+a function into a thunk might be bad:
 
 1) It can create a space leak. e.g.
       f x = let y () = [1..x]
@@ -433,7 +442,19 @@ into a thunk might be bad:
        g = \x. 30#
    Removing the \x would leave an unlifted binding.
 
-NB: none of these apply to a join point.
+4) It can create a worker of ill-kinded type (#22275).  Consider
+     f :: forall r (a :: TYPE r). () -> a
+     f x = f x
+   Here `x` is absent, but if we simply drop it we'd end up with
+     $wf :: forall r (a :: TYPE r). a
+   But alas $wf's type is ill-kinded: the kind of (/\r (a::TYPE r).a)
+   is (TYPE r), which mentions the bound variable `r`.  See also
+   Note [Worker/wrapper needs to add void arg last]
+
+See also Note [Preserving float barriers]
+
+NB: Of these, only (1-3) don't apply to a join point, which can be
+unlifted even if the RHS is not ok-for-speculation.
 
 Note [Preserving float barriers]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -467,7 +488,7 @@ which some are absent or one-shot and the resulting worker arguments:
 
   * \a{Abs}.\b{os}.\c{os}... ==> \b{os}.\c{os}.\(_::Void#)...
     Wrapper arg `a` was the only float barrier and had been dropped. Hence Void#
-  * \a{Abs,os}.\b{os}.\c... ==> \b{os}.\c...
+p  * \a{Abs,os}.\b{os}.\c... ==> \b{os}.\c...
     Worker arg `c` is a float barrier.
   * \a.\b{Abs}.\c{os}... ==> \a.\c{os}...
     Worker arg `a` is a float barrier.
@@ -479,6 +500,27 @@ which some are absent or one-shot and the resulting worker arguments:
 
 Executable examples in T21150.
 
+Note [Worker/wrapper needs to add void arg last]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Consider point (4) of Note [Protecting the last value argument]
+
+  f :: forall r (a :: TYPE r). () -> a
+  f x = f x
+
+As pointed out in (4) we need to add a void argument.  But if we add
+it /first/ we'd get
+
+  $wf :: Void# -> forall r (a :: TYPE r). a
+  $wf = ...
+
+But alas $wf's type is /still/ still-kinded, just as before in (4).
+Solution is simple: put the void argument /last/:
+
+  $wf :: forall r (a :: TYPE r). Void# -> a
+  $wf = ...
+
+c.f Note [SpecConstr void argument insertion] in GHC.Core.Opt.SpecConstr
+
 Note [Join points and beta-redexes]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Originally, the worker would invoke the original function by calling it with


=====================================
compiler/GHC/Core/Utils.hs
=====================================
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ coreAltsType :: [CoreAlt] -> Type
 coreAltsType (alt:_) = coreAltType alt
 coreAltsType []      = panic "coreAltsType"
 
-mkLamType  :: Var -> Type -> Type
+mkLamType  :: HasDebugCallStack => Var -> Type -> Type
 -- ^ Makes a @(->)@ type or an implicit forall type, depending
 -- on whether it is given a type variable or a term variable.
 -- This is used, for example, when producing the type of a lambda.


=====================================
testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T13143.stderr
=====================================
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 
 ==================== Tidy Core ====================
 Result size of Tidy Core
-  = {terms: 71, types: 41, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
+  = {terms: 71, types: 40, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 
 Rec {
 -- RHS size: {terms: 4, types: 3, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 T13143.$wf [InlPrag=NOINLINE, Occ=LoopBreaker]
-  :: (# #) -> forall {a}. a
+  :: forall {a}. (# #) -> a
 [GblId, Arity=1, Str=<B>b, Cpr=b, Unf=OtherCon []]
-T13143.$wf = \ _ [Occ=Dead] (@a) -> T13143.$wf GHC.Prim.(##) @a
+T13143.$wf = \ (@a) _ [Occ=Dead] -> T13143.$wf @a GHC.Prim.(##)
 end Rec }
 
 -- RHS size: {terms: 4, types: 3, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ f [InlPrag=[final]] :: forall a. Int -> a
  Unf=Unf{Src=InlineStable, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
          WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
          Guidance=ALWAYS_IF(arity=1,unsat_ok=True,boring_ok=True)
-         Tmpl= \ (@a) _ [Occ=Dead] -> T13143.$wf GHC.Prim.(##) @a}]
-f = \ (@a) _ [Occ=Dead] -> T13143.$wf GHC.Prim.(##) @a
+         Tmpl= \ (@a) _ [Occ=Dead] -> T13143.$wf @a GHC.Prim.(##)}]
+f = \ (@a) _ [Occ=Dead] -> T13143.$wf @a GHC.Prim.(##)
 
 -- RHS size: {terms: 1, types: 0, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 T13143.$trModule4 :: GHC.Prim.Addr#
@@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ T13143.$trModule :: GHC.Types.Module
 T13143.$trModule
   = GHC.Types.Module T13143.$trModule3 T13143.$trModule1
 
--- RHS size: {terms: 2, types: 0, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
-lvl :: forall {a}. a
+-- RHS size: {terms: 2, types: 1, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
+lvl :: Int
 [GblId, Str=b, Cpr=b]
-lvl = T13143.$wf GHC.Prim.(##)
+lvl = T13143.$wf @Int GHC.Prim.(##)
 
 Rec {
--- RHS size: {terms: 28, types: 8, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
+-- RHS size: {terms: 28, types: 7, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 T13143.$wg [InlPrag=[2], Occ=LoopBreaker]
   :: Bool -> Bool -> GHC.Prim.Int# -> GHC.Prim.Int#
 [GblId[StrictWorker([!, !])],


=====================================
testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T18328.stderr
=====================================
@@ -1,84 +1,90 @@
 
 ==================== Tidy Core ====================
 Result size of Tidy Core
-  = {terms: 65, types: 53, coercions: 0, joins: 1/1}
+  = {terms: 69, types: 55, coercions: 0, joins: 1/1}
 
--- RHS size: {terms: 38, types: 23, coercions: 0, joins: 1/1}
+-- RHS size: {terms: 42, types: 25, coercions: 0, joins: 1/1}
 T18328.$wf [InlPrag=[2]]
   :: forall {a}. GHC.Prim.Int# -> [a] -> [a] -> [a]
-[GblId,
+[GblId[StrictWorker([~, !])],
  Arity=3,
  Str=<SL><SL><ML>,
- Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
-         WorkFree=True, Expandable=True, Guidance=IF_ARGS [176 0 0] 306 0}]
+ Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True,
+         Value=True, ConLike=True, WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
+         Guidance=IF_ARGS [176 0 0] 306 0}]
 T18328.$wf
-  = \ (@a) (ww :: GHC.Prim.Int#) (w :: [a]) (w1 :: [a]) ->
+  = \ (@a) (ww :: GHC.Prim.Int#) (ys :: [a]) (eta :: [a]) ->
       join {
-        $wj [InlPrag=NOINLINE, Dmd=ML] :: forall {p}. [a]
-        [LclId[JoinId(1)]]
-        $wj (@p)
+        $wj [InlPrag=NOINLINE, Dmd=MC(1,L)] :: forall {p}. (# #) -> [a]
+        [LclId[JoinId(2)(Nothing)], Arity=1, Str=<A>, Unf=OtherCon []]
+        $wj (@p) _ [Occ=Dead, OS=OneShot]
           = case ww of {
-              __DEFAULT -> ++ @a w (++ @a w (++ @a w w1));
-              3# -> ++ @a w (++ @a w (++ @a w (++ @a w w1)))
+              __DEFAULT -> ++ @a ys (++ @a ys (++ @a ys eta));
+              3# -> ++ @a ys (++ @a ys (++ @a ys (++ @a ys eta)))
             } } in
       case ww of {
-        __DEFAULT -> ++ @a w w1;
-        1# -> jump $wj @Integer;
-        2# -> jump $wj @Integer;
-        3# -> jump $wj @Integer
+        __DEFAULT -> ++ @a ys eta;
+        1# -> jump $wj @Integer GHC.Prim.(##);
+        2# -> jump $wj @Integer GHC.Prim.(##);
+        3# -> jump $wj @Integer GHC.Prim.(##)
       }
 
 -- RHS size: {terms: 11, types: 9, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 f [InlPrag=[2]] :: forall a. Int -> [a] -> [a] -> [a]
 [GblId,
  Arity=3,
- Str=<1P(SL)><SL><ML>,
- Unf=Unf{Src=InlineStable, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
-         WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
+ Str=<1!P(SL)><SL><ML>,
+ Unf=Unf{Src=StableSystem, TopLvl=True,
+         Value=True, ConLike=True, WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
          Guidance=ALWAYS_IF(arity=3,unsat_ok=True,boring_ok=False)
          Tmpl= \ (@a)
-                 (w [Occ=Once1!] :: Int)
-                 (w1 [Occ=Once1] :: [a])
-                 (w2 [Occ=Once1] :: [a]) ->
-                 case w of { GHC.Types.I# ww [Occ=Once1] ->
-                 T18328.$wf @a ww w1 w2
+                 (x [Occ=Once1!] :: Int)
+                 (ys [Occ=Once1] :: [a])
+                 (eta [Occ=Once1] :: [a]) ->
+                 case x of { GHC.Types.I# ww [Occ=Once1] ->
+                 T18328.$wf @a ww ys eta
                  }}]
-f = \ (@a) (w :: Int) (w1 :: [a]) (w2 :: [a]) ->
-      case w of { GHC.Types.I# ww -> T18328.$wf @a ww w1 w2 }
+f = \ (@a) (x :: Int) (ys :: [a]) (eta :: [a]) ->
+      case x of { GHC.Types.I# ww -> T18328.$wf @a ww ys eta }
 
 -- RHS size: {terms: 1, types: 0, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 T18328.$trModule4 :: GHC.Prim.Addr#
 [GblId,
- Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
-         WorkFree=True, Expandable=True, Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 20 0}]
+ Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True,
+         Value=True, ConLike=True, WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
+         Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 20 0}]
 T18328.$trModule4 = "main"#
 
 -- RHS size: {terms: 2, types: 0, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 T18328.$trModule3 :: GHC.Types.TrName
 [GblId,
- Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
-         WorkFree=True, Expandable=True, Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 10 10}]
+ Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True,
+         Value=True, ConLike=True, WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
+         Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 10 10}]
 T18328.$trModule3 = GHC.Types.TrNameS T18328.$trModule4
 
 -- RHS size: {terms: 1, types: 0, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 T18328.$trModule2 :: GHC.Prim.Addr#
 [GblId,
- Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
-         WorkFree=True, Expandable=True, Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 30 0}]
+ Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True,
+         Value=True, ConLike=True, WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
+         Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 30 0}]
 T18328.$trModule2 = "T18328"#
 
 -- RHS size: {terms: 2, types: 0, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 T18328.$trModule1 :: GHC.Types.TrName
 [GblId,
- Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
-         WorkFree=True, Expandable=True, Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 10 10}]
+ Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True,
+         Value=True, ConLike=True, WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
+         Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 10 10}]
 T18328.$trModule1 = GHC.Types.TrNameS T18328.$trModule2
 
 -- RHS size: {terms: 3, types: 0, coercions: 0, joins: 0/0}
 T18328.$trModule :: GHC.Types.Module
 [GblId,
- Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
-         WorkFree=True, Expandable=True, Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 10 10}]
+ Unf=Unf{Src=<vanilla>, TopLvl=True,
+         Value=True, ConLike=True, WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
+         Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 10 10}]
 T18328.$trModule
   = GHC.Types.Module T18328.$trModule3 T18328.$trModule1
 


=====================================
testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T22725.hs
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+module M where
+
+import GHC.Exts (TYPE)
+
+f :: forall r (a :: TYPE r). () -> a
+f x = f x


=====================================
testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/all.T
=====================================
@@ -398,3 +398,4 @@ test('T22112', normal, compile, ['-O -dsuppress-uniques -dno-typeable-binds -ddu
 test('T22491', normal, compile, ['-O2'])
 test('T22623', normal, multimod_compile, ['T22623', '-O -v0'])
 test('T22662', normal, compile, [''])
+test('T22725', normal, compile, ['-O'])



View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/commit/aad62f1f11679d875705a0d9b86fbc9552e336cc

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/commit/aad62f1f11679d875705a0d9b86fbc9552e336cc
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/attachments/20230411/7b757a38/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ghc-commits mailing list