[Git][ghc/ghc][wip/pmcheck-ncon] Add `PmNCons` to `Check` for correct warnings in the presence of `COMPLETE` groups
Sebastian Graf
gitlab at gitlab.haskell.org
Mon May 27 16:25:14 UTC 2019
Sebastian Graf pushed to branch wip/pmcheck-ncon at Glasgow Haskell Compiler / GHC
Commits:
2f3b8824 by Sebastian Graf at 2019-05-27T16:24:41Z
Add `PmNCons` to `Check` for correct warnings in the presence of `COMPLETE` groups
Previously, we had an elaborate mechanism for selecting the warnings to
generate in the presence of different `COMPLETE` matching groups that,
albeit finely-tuned, produced wrong results from an end user's
perspective in some cases (#13363).
The underlying issue is that at the point where the `ConVar` case has to
commit to a particular `COMPLETE` group, there's not enough information
to do so and the status quo was to just enumerate all possible complete
sets nondeterministically.
The `getResult` function would then pick the outcome according to
metrics defined in accordance to the user's guide. But crucially, it
lacked knowledge about the order in which affected clauses appear,
leading to the surprising behavior in #13363.
The introduction of an `PmNCons` variant in `PmPat` fixes this: Instead
of committing to a particular `COMPLETE` group in the `ConVar` case,
we now split off the matching constructor incrementally and record the
newly covered case in `PmNCons`.
After all clauses have been processed this way, we filter out any value
vector abstractions from the uncovered set involving `PmNCons` whose set
of covered constructors completely overlap a `COMPLETE` set.
- - - - -
13 changed files:
- compiler/deSugar/Check.hs
- compiler/deSugar/PmExpr.hs
- compiler/deSugar/TmOracle.hs
- compiler/utils/Binary.hs
- compiler/utils/Outputable.hs
- docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.rst
- libraries/binary
- + testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363a.hs
- + testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363a.stderr
- + testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363b.hs
- + testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363b.stderr
- testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/all.T
- + testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/pmc008.hs
Changes:
=====================================
compiler/deSugar/Check.hs
=====================================
@@ -55,20 +55,19 @@ import TyCoRep
import Type
import UniqSupply
import DsUtils (isTrueLHsExpr)
-import Maybes (expectJust)
+import Maybes (MaybeT (..), expectJust)
import qualified GHC.LanguageExtensions as LangExt
import Data.List (find)
import Data.Maybe (catMaybes, isJust, fromMaybe)
-import Control.Monad (forM, when, forM_, zipWithM, filterM)
+import Control.Monad (forM, foldM, when, guard, forM_, zipWithM, filterM)
+import Control.Monad.Trans.Class (lift)
import Coercion
import TcEvidence
import TcSimplify (tcNormalise)
import IOEnv
import qualified Data.Semigroup as Semi
-import ListT (ListT(..), fold, select)
-
{-
This module checks pattern matches for:
\begin{enumerate}
@@ -91,72 +90,33 @@ The algorithm is based on the paper:
%************************************************************************
-}
--- We use the non-determinism monad to apply the algorithm to several
--- possible sets of constructors. Users can specify complete sets of
--- constructors by using COMPLETE pragmas.
--- The algorithm only picks out constructor
--- sets deep in the bowels which makes a simpler `mapM` more difficult to
--- implement. The non-determinism is only used in one place, see the ConVar
--- case in `pmCheckHd`.
-
-type PmM a = ListT DsM a
+type PmM = DsM
-liftD :: DsM a -> PmM a
-liftD m = ListT $ \sk fk -> m >>= \a -> sk a fk
-
--- Pick the first match complete covered match or otherwise the "best" match.
--- The best match is the one with the least uncovered clauses, ties broken
--- by the number of inaccessible clauses followed by number of redundant
--- clauses.
---
--- This is specified in the
--- "Disambiguating between multiple ``COMPLETE`` pragmas" section of the
--- users' guide. If you update the implementation of this function, make sure
--- to update that section of the users' guide as well.
-getResult :: PmM PmResult -> DsM PmResult
-getResult ls
- = do { res <- fold ls goM (pure Nothing)
- ; case res of
- Nothing -> panic "getResult is empty"
- Just a -> return a }
- where
- goM :: PmResult -> DsM (Maybe PmResult) -> DsM (Maybe PmResult)
- goM mpm dpm = do { pmr <- dpm
- ; return $ Just $ go pmr mpm }
-
- -- Careful not to force unecessary results
- go :: Maybe PmResult -> PmResult -> PmResult
- go Nothing rs = rs
- go (Just old@(PmResult prov rs (UncoveredPatterns us) is)) new
- | null us && null rs && null is = old
- | otherwise =
- let PmResult prov' rs' (UncoveredPatterns us') is' = new
- in case compareLength us us'
- `mappend` (compareLength is is')
- `mappend` (compareLength rs rs')
- `mappend` (compare prov prov') of
- GT -> new
- EQ -> new
- LT -> old
- go (Just (PmResult _ _ (TypeOfUncovered _) _)) _new
- = panic "getResult: No inhabitation candidates"
-
-data PatTy = PAT | VA -- Used only as a kind, to index PmPat
+-- | Used only as a kind, to index PmPat
+data PatTy = PAT | VA
-- The *arity* of a PatVec [p1,..,pn] is
-- the number of p1..pn that are not Guards
data PmPat :: PatTy -> * where
+ -- | For the arguments' meaning see 'HsPat.ConPatOut'.
PmCon :: { pm_con_con :: ConLike
, pm_con_arg_tys :: [Type]
, pm_con_tvs :: [TyVar]
, pm_con_dicts :: [EvVar]
, pm_con_args :: [PmPat t] } -> PmPat t
- -- For PmCon arguments' meaning see @ConPatOut@ in hsSyn/HsPat.hs
PmVar :: { pm_var_id :: Id } -> PmPat t
- PmLit :: { pm_lit_lit :: PmLit } -> PmPat t -- See Note [Literals in PmPat]
+ -- | See Note [Literals in PmPat]
+ PmLit :: { pm_lit_lit :: PmLit } -> PmPat t
+ -- | Literal values the wrapped 'Id' cannot take on.
+ -- See Note [PmNLit and PmNCon].
PmNLit :: { pm_lit_id :: Id
, pm_lit_not :: [PmLit] } -> PmPat 'VA
+ -- | Top-level 'ConLike's the wrapped 'Id' cannot take on.
+ -- See Note [PmNLit and PmNCon].
+ PmNCon :: { pm_con_id :: Id
+ , pm_con_grps :: [[ConLike]]
+ , pm_con_not :: [ConLike] } -> PmPat 'VA
PmGrd :: { pm_grd_pv :: PatVec
, pm_grd_expr :: PmExpr } -> PmPat 'PAT
-- | A fake guard pattern (True <- _) used to represent cases we cannot handle.
@@ -199,8 +159,7 @@ data Covered = Covered | NotCovered
deriving Show
instance Outputable Covered where
- ppr (Covered) = text "Covered"
- ppr (NotCovered) = text "NotCovered"
+ ppr = text . show
-- Like the or monoid for booleans
-- Covered = True, Uncovered = False
@@ -217,8 +176,7 @@ data Diverged = Diverged | NotDiverged
deriving Show
instance Outputable Diverged where
- ppr Diverged = text "Diverged"
- ppr NotDiverged = text "NotDiverged"
+ ppr = text . show
instance Semi.Semigroup Diverged where
Diverged <> _ = Diverged
@@ -229,51 +187,26 @@ instance Monoid Diverged where
mempty = NotDiverged
mappend = (Semi.<>)
--- | When we learned that a given match group is complete
-data Provenance =
- FromBuiltin -- ^ From the original definition of the type
- -- constructor.
- | FromComplete -- ^ From a user-provided @COMPLETE@ pragma
- deriving (Show, Eq, Ord)
-
-instance Outputable Provenance where
- ppr = text . show
-
-instance Semi.Semigroup Provenance where
- FromComplete <> _ = FromComplete
- _ <> FromComplete = FromComplete
- _ <> _ = FromBuiltin
-
-instance Monoid Provenance where
- mempty = FromBuiltin
- mappend = (Semi.<>)
-
data PartialResult = PartialResult {
- presultProvenance :: Provenance
- -- keep track of provenance because we don't want
- -- to warn about redundant matches if the result
- -- is contaminated with a COMPLETE pragma
- , presultCovered :: Covered
+ presultCovered :: Covered
, presultUncovered :: Uncovered
, presultDivergent :: Diverged }
instance Outputable PartialResult where
- ppr (PartialResult prov c vsa d)
- = text "PartialResult" <+> ppr prov <+> ppr c
- <+> ppr d <+> ppr vsa
+ ppr (PartialResult c vsa d)
+ = text "PartialResult" <+> ppr c <+> ppr d <+> ppr vsa
instance Semi.Semigroup PartialResult where
- (PartialResult prov1 cs1 vsa1 ds1)
- <> (PartialResult prov2 cs2 vsa2 ds2)
- = PartialResult (prov1 Semi.<> prov2)
- (cs1 Semi.<> cs2)
+ (PartialResult cs1 vsa1 ds1)
+ <> (PartialResult cs2 vsa2 ds2)
+ = PartialResult (cs1 Semi.<> cs2)
(vsa1 Semi.<> vsa2)
(ds1 Semi.<> ds2)
instance Monoid PartialResult where
- mempty = PartialResult mempty mempty [] mempty
+ mempty = PartialResult mempty [] mempty
mappend = (Semi.<>)
-- newtype ChoiceOf a = ChoiceOf [a]
@@ -291,15 +224,13 @@ instance Monoid PartialResult where
--
data PmResult =
PmResult {
- pmresultProvenance :: Provenance
- , pmresultRedundant :: [Located [LPat GhcTc]]
+ pmresultRedundant :: [Located [LPat GhcTc]]
, pmresultUncovered :: UncoveredCandidates
, pmresultInaccessible :: [Located [LPat GhcTc]] }
instance Outputable PmResult where
ppr pmr = hang (text "PmResult") 2 $ vcat
- [ text "pmresultProvenance" <+> ppr (pmresultProvenance pmr)
- , text "pmresultRedundant" <+> ppr (pmresultRedundant pmr)
+ [ text "pmresultRedundant" <+> ppr (pmresultRedundant pmr)
, text "pmresultUncovered" <+> ppr (pmresultUncovered pmr)
, text "pmresultInaccessible" <+> ppr (pmresultInaccessible pmr)
]
@@ -324,11 +255,11 @@ instance Outputable UncoveredCandidates where
-- | The empty pattern check result
emptyPmResult :: PmResult
-emptyPmResult = PmResult FromBuiltin [] (UncoveredPatterns []) []
+emptyPmResult = PmResult [] (UncoveredPatterns []) []
-- | Non-exhaustive empty case with unknown/trivial inhabitants
uncoveredWithTy :: Type -> PmResult
-uncoveredWithTy ty = PmResult FromBuiltin [] (TypeOfUncovered ty) []
+uncoveredWithTy ty = PmResult [] (TypeOfUncovered ty) []
{-
%************************************************************************
@@ -341,8 +272,8 @@ uncoveredWithTy ty = PmResult FromBuiltin [] (TypeOfUncovered ty) []
-- | Check a single pattern binding (let)
checkSingle :: DynFlags -> DsMatchContext -> Id -> Pat GhcTc -> DsM ()
checkSingle dflags ctxt@(DsMatchContext _ locn) var p = do
- tracePmD "checkSingle" (vcat [ppr ctxt, ppr var, ppr p])
- mb_pm_res <- tryM (getResult (checkSingle' locn var p))
+ tracePm "checkSingle" (vcat [ppr ctxt, ppr var, ppr p])
+ mb_pm_res <- tryM (checkSingle' locn var p)
case mb_pm_res of
Left _ -> warnPmIters dflags ctxt
Right res -> dsPmWarn dflags ctxt res
@@ -350,25 +281,25 @@ checkSingle dflags ctxt@(DsMatchContext _ locn) var p = do
-- | Check a single pattern binding (let)
checkSingle' :: SrcSpan -> Id -> Pat GhcTc -> PmM PmResult
checkSingle' locn var p = do
- liftD resetPmIterDs -- set the iter-no to zero
- fam_insts <- liftD dsGetFamInstEnvs
- clause <- liftD $ translatePat fam_insts p
+ resetPmIterDs -- set the iter-no to zero
+ fam_insts <- dsGetFamInstEnvs
+ clause <- translatePat fam_insts p
missing <- mkInitialUncovered [var]
tracePm "checkSingle': missing" (vcat (map pprValVecDebug missing))
-- no guards
- PartialResult prov cs us ds <- runMany (pmcheckI clause []) missing
- let us' = UncoveredPatterns us
+ PartialResult cs us ds <- runMany (pmcheckI clause []) missing
+ us' <- UncoveredPatterns <$> normaliseUncovered us
return $ case (cs,ds) of
- (Covered, _ ) -> PmResult prov [] us' [] -- useful
- (NotCovered, NotDiverged) -> PmResult prov m us' [] -- redundant
- (NotCovered, Diverged ) -> PmResult prov [] us' m -- inaccessible rhs
+ (Covered, _ ) -> PmResult [] us' [] -- useful
+ (NotCovered, NotDiverged) -> PmResult m us' [] -- redundant
+ (NotCovered, Diverged ) -> PmResult [] us' m -- inaccessible rhs
where m = [cL locn [cL locn p]]
-- | Exhaustive for guard matches, is used for guards in pattern bindings and
-- in @MultiIf@ expressions.
checkGuardMatches :: HsMatchContext Name -- Match context
-> GRHSs GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc) -- Guarded RHSs
- -> DsM ()
+ -> PmM ()
checkGuardMatches hs_ctx guards@(GRHSs _ grhss _) = do
dflags <- getDynFlags
let combinedLoc = foldl1 combineSrcSpans (map getLoc grhss)
@@ -383,14 +314,14 @@ checkGuardMatches _ (XGRHSs _) = panic "checkGuardMatches"
-- | Check a matchgroup (case, functions, etc.)
checkMatches :: DynFlags -> DsMatchContext
- -> [Id] -> [LMatch GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc)] -> DsM ()
+ -> [Id] -> [LMatch GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc)] -> PmM ()
checkMatches dflags ctxt vars matches = do
- tracePmD "checkMatches" (hang (vcat [ppr ctxt
+ tracePm "checkMatches" (hang (vcat [ppr ctxt
, ppr vars
, text "Matches:"])
2
(vcat (map ppr matches)))
- mb_pm_res <- tryM $ getResult $ case matches of
+ mb_pm_res <- tryM $ case matches of
-- Check EmptyCase separately
-- See Note [Checking EmptyCase Expressions]
[] | [var] <- vars -> checkEmptyCase' var
@@ -405,38 +336,36 @@ checkMatches' :: [Id] -> [LMatch GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc)] -> PmM PmResult
checkMatches' vars matches
| null matches = panic "checkMatches': EmptyCase"
| otherwise = do
- liftD resetPmIterDs -- set the iter-no to zero
+ resetPmIterDs -- set the iter-no to zero
missing <- mkInitialUncovered vars
tracePm "checkMatches': missing" (vcat (map pprValVecDebug missing))
- (prov, rs,us,ds) <- go matches missing
+ (rs,us,ds) <- go matches missing
+ us' <- normaliseUncovered us
return $ PmResult {
- pmresultProvenance = prov
- , pmresultRedundant = map hsLMatchToLPats rs
- , pmresultUncovered = UncoveredPatterns us
+ pmresultRedundant = map hsLMatchToLPats rs
+ , pmresultUncovered = UncoveredPatterns us'
, pmresultInaccessible = map hsLMatchToLPats ds }
where
go :: [LMatch GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc)] -> Uncovered
- -> PmM (Provenance
- , [LMatch GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc)]
+ -> PmM ( [LMatch GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc)]
, Uncovered
, [LMatch GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc)])
- go [] missing = return (mempty, [], missing, [])
+ go [] missing = return ([], missing, [])
go (m:ms) missing = do
tracePm "checkMatches': go" (ppr m $$ ppr missing)
- fam_insts <- liftD dsGetFamInstEnvs
- (clause, guards) <- liftD $ translateMatch fam_insts m
- r@(PartialResult prov cs missing' ds)
+ fam_insts <- dsGetFamInstEnvs
+ (clause, guards) <- translateMatch fam_insts m
+ r@(PartialResult cs missing' ds)
<- runMany (pmcheckI clause guards) missing
tracePm "checkMatches': go: res" (ppr r)
- (ms_prov, rs, final_u, is) <- go ms missing'
- let final_prov = prov `mappend` ms_prov
+ (rs, final_u, is) <- go ms missing'
return $ case (cs, ds) of
-- useful
- (Covered, _ ) -> (final_prov, rs, final_u, is)
+ (Covered, _ ) -> (rs, final_u, is)
-- redundant
- (NotCovered, NotDiverged) -> (final_prov, m:rs, final_u,is)
+ (NotCovered, NotDiverged) -> (m:rs, final_u,is)
-- inaccessible
- (NotCovered, Diverged ) -> (final_prov, rs, final_u, m:is)
+ (NotCovered, Diverged ) -> (rs, final_u, m:is)
hsLMatchToLPats :: LMatch id body -> Located [LPat id]
hsLMatchToLPats (dL->L l (Match { m_pats = pats })) = cL l pats
@@ -464,7 +393,7 @@ checkEmptyCase' var = do
pure $ fmap (ValVec [va]) mb_sat
return $ if null missing_m
then emptyPmResult
- else PmResult FromBuiltin [] (UncoveredPatterns missing_m) []
+ else PmResult [] (UncoveredPatterns missing_m) []
-- | Returns 'True' if the argument 'Type' is a fully saturated application of
-- a closed type constructor.
@@ -515,7 +444,7 @@ pmTopNormaliseType_maybe :: FamInstEnvs -> Bag EvVar -> Type
-- is a type family with a variable result kind. I (Richard E) can't think
-- of a way to cause trouble here, though.
pmTopNormaliseType_maybe env ty_cs typ
- = do (_, mb_typ') <- liftD $ initTcDsForSolver $ tcNormalise ty_cs typ
+ = do (_, mb_typ') <- initTcDsForSolver $ tcNormalise ty_cs typ
-- Before proceeding, we chuck typ into the constraint solver, in case
-- solving for given equalities may reduce typ some. See
-- "Wrinkle: local equalities" in
@@ -578,8 +507,8 @@ pmTopNormaliseType_maybe env ty_cs typ
-- for why this is done.)
pmInitialTmTyCs :: PmM Delta
pmInitialTmTyCs = do
- ty_cs <- liftD getDictsDs
- tm_cs <- map toComplex . bagToList <$> liftD getTmCsDs
+ ty_cs <- getDictsDs
+ tm_cs <- map toComplex . bagToList <$> getTmCsDs
sat_ty <- tyOracle ty_cs
let initTyCs = if sat_ty then ty_cs else emptyBag
initTmState = fromMaybe initialTmState (tmOracle initialTmState tm_cs)
@@ -670,12 +599,40 @@ tmTyCsAreSatisfiable
, delta_tm_cs = term_cs }
_unsat -> Nothing
+-- | This weeds out patterns with 'PmNCon's where at least one COMPLETE set is
+-- rendered vacuous by equality constraints.
+normaliseUncovered :: Uncovered -> PmM Uncovered
+normaliseUncovered us = do
+ let allM p = foldM (\b a -> if b then p a else pure False) True
+ anyM p = foldM (\b a -> if b then pure True else p a) False
+ valvec_inhabited p (ValVec vva delta) = allM (valabs_inhabited (p delta)) vva
+ valabs_inhabited p v = case v :: ValAbs of
+ -- TODO: There's no easy way to call allCompleteMatches only from
+ -- knowing x's idType. Maybe this doesn't matter.
+ -- PmVar x -> var_inh (p x) []
+ PmNCon x grps ncons -> var_inh (p x) grps ncons
+ _ -> pure True
+ var_inh p groups ncons =
+ allM (anyM p . filter (`notElem` ncons)) groups
+
+ -- We'll first do a cheap sweep without consulting the oracles
+ let cheap_inh_test _ _ _ = pure True
+ us1 <- filterM (valvec_inhabited cheap_inh_test) us
+ -- Then we'll do another pass trying to weed out the rest with (in)equalities
+ let actual_inh_test delta x con = do
+ ic <- mkOneConFull x con
+ tracePm "nrm" (ppr con <+> ppr x <+> ppr (delta_tm_cs delta))
+ isJust <$> pmIsSatisfiable delta (ic_tm_ct ic) (ic_ty_cs ic) (ic_strict_arg_tys ic)
+ us2 <- filterM (valvec_inhabited actual_inh_test) us1
+ tracePm "normaliseUncovered" (vcat (map pprValVecDebug us2))
+ pure us2
+
-- | Implements two performance optimizations, as described in the
-- \"Strict argument type constraints\" section of
-- @Note [Extensions to GADTs Meet Their Match]@.
checkAllNonVoid :: RecTcChecker -> Delta -> [Type] -> PmM Bool
checkAllNonVoid rec_ts amb_cs strict_arg_tys = do
- fam_insts <- liftD dsGetFamInstEnvs
+ fam_insts <- dsGetFamInstEnvs
let definitely_inhabited =
definitelyInhabitedType fam_insts (delta_ty_cs amb_cs)
tys_to_check <- filterOutM definitely_inhabited strict_arg_tys
@@ -832,7 +789,7 @@ equalities (such as i ~ Int) that may be in scope.
inhabitationCandidates :: Bag EvVar -> Type
-> PmM (Either Type (TyCon, [InhabitationCandidate]))
inhabitationCandidates ty_cs ty = do
- fam_insts <- liftD dsGetFamInstEnvs
+ fam_insts <- dsGetFamInstEnvs
mb_norm_res <- pmTopNormaliseType_maybe fam_insts ty_cs ty
case mb_norm_res of
Just (src_ty, dcs, core_ty) -> alts_to_check src_ty core_ty dcs
@@ -856,7 +813,7 @@ inhabitationCandidates ty_cs ty = do
| tc `elem` trivially_inhabited
-> case dcs of
[] -> return (Left src_ty)
- (_:_) -> do var <- liftD $ mkPmId core_ty
+ (_:_) -> do var <- mkPmId core_ty
let va = build_tm (PmVar var) dcs
return $ Right (tc, [InhabitationCandidate
{ ic_val_abs = va, ic_tm_ct = mkIdEq var
@@ -866,7 +823,7 @@ inhabitationCandidates ty_cs ty = do
-- Don't consider abstract tycons since we don't know what their
-- constructors are, which makes the results of coverage checking
-- them extremely misleading.
- -> liftD $ do
+ -> do
var <- mkPmId core_ty -- it would be wrong to unify x
alts <- mapM (mkOneConFull var . RealDataCon) (tyConDataCons tc)
return $ Right
@@ -932,7 +889,7 @@ truePattern = nullaryConPattern (RealDataCon trueDataCon)
{-# INLINE truePattern #-}
-- | Generate a `canFail` pattern vector of a specific type
-mkCanFailPmPat :: Type -> DsM PatVec
+mkCanFailPmPat :: Type -> PmM PatVec
mkCanFailPmPat ty = do
var <- mkPmVar ty
return [var, PmFake]
@@ -967,7 +924,7 @@ mkLitPattern lit = PmLit { pm_lit_lit = PmSLit lit }
-- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- * Transform (Pat Id) into of (PmPat Id)
-translatePat :: FamInstEnvs -> Pat GhcTc -> DsM PatVec
+translatePat :: FamInstEnvs -> Pat GhcTc -> PmM PatVec
translatePat fam_insts pat = case pat of
WildPat ty -> mkPmVars [ty]
VarPat _ id -> return [PmVar (unLoc id)]
@@ -1179,12 +1136,12 @@ from translation in pattern matcher.
-- | Translate a list of patterns (Note: each pattern is translated
-- to a pattern vector but we do not concatenate the results).
-translatePatVec :: FamInstEnvs -> [Pat GhcTc] -> DsM [PatVec]
+translatePatVec :: FamInstEnvs -> [Pat GhcTc] -> PmM [PatVec]
translatePatVec fam_insts pats = mapM (translatePat fam_insts) pats
-- | Translate a constructor pattern
translateConPatVec :: FamInstEnvs -> [Type] -> [TyVar]
- -> ConLike -> HsConPatDetails GhcTc -> DsM PatVec
+ -> ConLike -> HsConPatDetails GhcTc -> PmM PatVec
translateConPatVec fam_insts _univ_tys _ex_tvs _ (PrefixCon ps)
= concat <$> translatePatVec fam_insts (map unLoc ps)
translateConPatVec fam_insts _univ_tys _ex_tvs _ (InfixCon p1 p2)
@@ -1240,11 +1197,12 @@ translateConPatVec fam_insts univ_tys ex_tvs c (RecCon (HsRecFields fs _))
-- Translate a single match
translateMatch :: FamInstEnvs -> LMatch GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc)
- -> DsM (PatVec,[PatVec])
+ -> PmM (PatVec,[PatVec])
translateMatch fam_insts (dL->L _ (Match { m_pats = lpats, m_grhss = grhss })) =
do
pats' <- concat <$> translatePatVec fam_insts pats
guards' <- mapM (translateGuards fam_insts) guards
+ -- tracePm "translateMatch" (vcat [ppr pats, ppr pats', ppr guards, ppr guards'])
return (pats', guards')
where
extractGuards :: LGRHS GhcTc (LHsExpr GhcTc) -> [GuardStmt GhcTc]
@@ -1259,11 +1217,11 @@ translateMatch _ _ = panic "translateMatch"
-- * Transform source guards (GuardStmt Id) to PmPats (Pattern)
-- | Translate a list of guard statements to a pattern vector
-translateGuards :: FamInstEnvs -> [GuardStmt GhcTc] -> DsM PatVec
+translateGuards :: FamInstEnvs -> [GuardStmt GhcTc] -> PmM PatVec
translateGuards fam_insts guards = do
all_guards <- concat <$> mapM (translateGuard fam_insts) guards
let
- shouldKeep :: Pattern -> DsM Bool
+ shouldKeep :: Pattern -> PmM Bool
shouldKeep p
| PmVar {} <- p = pure True
| PmCon {} <- p = (&&)
@@ -1288,7 +1246,7 @@ translateGuards fam_insts guards = do
pure (PmFake : kept)
-- | Check whether a pattern can fail to match
-cantFailPattern :: Pattern -> DsM Bool
+cantFailPattern :: Pattern -> PmM Bool
cantFailPattern PmVar {} = pure True
cantFailPattern PmCon { pm_con_con = c, pm_con_arg_tys = tys, pm_con_args = ps}
= (&&) <$> singleMatchConstructor c tys <*> allM cantFailPattern ps
@@ -1296,7 +1254,7 @@ cantFailPattern (PmGrd pv _e) = allM cantFailPattern pv
cantFailPattern _ = pure False
-- | Translate a guard statement to Pattern
-translateGuard :: FamInstEnvs -> GuardStmt GhcTc -> DsM PatVec
+translateGuard :: FamInstEnvs -> GuardStmt GhcTc -> PmM PatVec
translateGuard fam_insts guard = case guard of
BodyStmt _ e _ _ -> translateBoolGuard e
LetStmt _ binds -> translateLet (unLoc binds)
@@ -1309,18 +1267,18 @@ translateGuard fam_insts guard = case guard of
XStmtLR {} -> panic "translateGuard RecStmt"
-- | Translate let-bindings
-translateLet :: HsLocalBinds GhcTc -> DsM PatVec
+translateLet :: HsLocalBinds GhcTc -> PmM PatVec
translateLet _binds = return []
-- | Translate a pattern guard
-translateBind :: FamInstEnvs -> LPat GhcTc -> LHsExpr GhcTc -> DsM PatVec
+translateBind :: FamInstEnvs -> LPat GhcTc -> LHsExpr GhcTc -> PmM PatVec
translateBind fam_insts (dL->L _ p) e = do
ps <- translatePat fam_insts p
g <- mkGuard ps (unLoc e)
return [g]
-- | Translate a boolean guard
-translateBoolGuard :: LHsExpr GhcTc -> DsM PatVec
+translateBoolGuard :: LHsExpr GhcTc -> PmM PatVec
translateBoolGuard e
| isJust (isTrueLHsExpr e) = return []
-- The formal thing to do would be to generate (True <- True)
@@ -1421,10 +1379,17 @@ efficiently, which gave rise to #11276. The original approach translated
pat |> co ===> x (pat <- (e |> co))
-Instead, we now check whether the coercion is a hole or if it is just refl, in
-which case we can drop it. Unfortunately, data families generate useful
-coercions so guards are still generated in these cases and checking data
-families is not really efficient.
+Why did we do this seemingly unnecessary expansion in the first place?
+The reason is that the type of @pat |> co@ (which is the type of the value
+abstraction we match against) might be different than that of @pat at . Data
+instances such as @Sing (a :: Bool)@ are a good example of this: If we would
+just drop the coercion, we'd get a type error when matching @pat@ against its
+value abstraction, with the result being that pmIsSatisfiable decides that every
+possible data constructor fitting @pat@ is rejected as uninhabitated, leading to
+a lot of false warnings.
+
+But we can check whether the coercion is a hole or if it is just refl, in
+which case we can drop it.
%************************************************************************
%* *
@@ -1441,6 +1406,7 @@ families is not really efficient.
pmPatType :: PmPat p -> Type
pmPatType (PmCon { pm_con_con = con, pm_con_arg_tys = tys })
= conLikeResTy con tys
+pmPatType (PmNCon { pm_con_id = x }) = idType x
pmPatType (PmVar { pm_var_id = x }) = idType x
pmPatType (PmLit { pm_lit_lit = l }) = pmLitType l
pmPatType (PmNLit { pm_lit_id = x }) = idType x
@@ -1471,10 +1437,13 @@ checker adheres to. Since the paper's publication, there have been some
additional features added to the coverage checker which are not described in
the paper. This Note serves as a reference for these new features.
------
--- Strict argument type constraints
------
+* Handling of uninhabited fields like `!Void`.
+ See Note [Strict argument type constraints]
+* Efficient handling of literal splitting, large enumerations and accurate
+ redundancy warnings for `COMPLETE` groups. See Note [PmNLit and PmNCon]
+Note [Strict argument type constraints]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the ConVar case of clause processing, each conlike K traditionally
generates two different forms of constraints:
@@ -1594,8 +1563,43 @@ intuition formal, we say that a type is definitely inhabitable (DI) if:
1. C has no equality constraints (since they might be unsatisfiable)
2. C has no strict argument types (since they might be uninhabitable)
-It's relatively cheap to cheap if a type is DI, so before we call `nonVoid`
+It's relatively cheap to check if a type is DI, so before we call `nonVoid`
on a list of strict argument types, we filter out all of the DI ones.
+
+Note [PmNLit and PmNCon]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+TLDR:
+* 'PmNLit' is an efficient encoding of literals we already matched on.
+ Important for checking redundancy without blowing up the term oracle.
+* 'PmNCon' is an efficient encoding of all constructors we already matched on.
+ Important for proper redundancy and completeness checks while being more
+ efficient than the `ConVar` split in GADTs Meet Their Match.
+
+GADTs Meet Their Match handled literals by desugaring to guard expressions,
+effectively encoding the knowledge in the term oracle. As it turned out, this
+doesn't scale (#11303, cf. Note [Literals in PmPat]), so we adopted an approach
+that encodes negative information about literals as a 'PmNLit', which encodes
+literal values the carried variable may no longer take on.
+
+The counterpart for constructor values is 'PmNCon', where we associate
+with a variable the topmost 'ConLike's it surely can't be. This is in contrast
+to GADTs Meet Their Match, where instead the `ConVar` case would split the value
+vector abstraction on all possible constructors from a `COMPLETE` group.
+In fact, we used to do just that, but committing to a particular `COMPLETE`
+group in `ConVar`, even nondeterministically, led to misleading redundancy
+warnings (#13363).
+Apart from that, splitting on huge enumerations in the presence of a catch-all
+case is a huge waste of resources.
+
+Note that since we have pattern guards, the term oracle must also be able to
+cope with negative equations involving literals and constructors, cf.
+Note [Refutable shapes] in TmOracle. Since we don't want to put too much strain
+on the term oracle with repeated coverage checks against all `COMPLETE` groups,
+we only do so once at the end in 'normaliseUncovered'.
+
+Peter Sestoft was probably the first to describe positive and negative
+information about terms in this manner in ML Pattern Match Compilation and
+Partial Evaluation.
-}
instance Outputable InhabitationCandidate where
@@ -1610,7 +1614,7 @@ instance Outputable InhabitationCandidate where
-- | Generate an 'InhabitationCandidate' for a given conlike (generate
-- fresh variables of the appropriate type for arguments)
-mkOneConFull :: Id -> ConLike -> DsM InhabitationCandidate
+mkOneConFull :: Id -> ConLike -> PmM InhabitationCandidate
-- * x :: T tys, where T is an algebraic data type
-- NB: in the case of a data family, T is the *representation* TyCon
-- e.g. data instance T (a,b) = T1 a b
@@ -1664,18 +1668,18 @@ mkOneConFull x con = do
-- * More smart constructors and fresh variable generation
-- | Create a guard pattern
-mkGuard :: PatVec -> HsExpr GhcTc -> DsM Pattern
+mkGuard :: PatVec -> HsExpr GhcTc -> PmM Pattern
mkGuard pv e = do
res <- allM cantFailPattern pv
let expr = hsExprToPmExpr e
- tracePmD "mkGuard" (vcat [ppr pv, ppr e, ppr res, ppr expr])
+ tracePm "mkGuard" (vcat [ppr pv, ppr e, ppr res, ppr expr])
if | res -> pure (PmGrd pv expr)
| PmExprOther {} <- expr -> pure PmFake
| otherwise -> pure (PmGrd pv expr)
--- | Create a term equality of the form: `(x ~ lit)`
-mkPosEq :: Id -> PmLit -> ComplexEq
-mkPosEq x l = (PmExprVar (idName x), PmExprLit l)
+-- | Create a term equality of the form: `(x ~ e)`
+mkPosEq :: Id -> PmExpr -> ComplexEq
+mkPosEq x e = (PmExprVar (idName x), e)
{-# INLINE mkPosEq #-}
-- | Create a term equality of the form: `(x ~ x)`
@@ -1686,17 +1690,17 @@ mkIdEq x = (PmExprVar name, PmExprVar name)
{-# INLINE mkIdEq #-}
-- | Generate a variable pattern of a given type
-mkPmVar :: Type -> DsM (PmPat p)
+mkPmVar :: Type -> PmM (PmPat p)
mkPmVar ty = PmVar <$> mkPmId ty
{-# INLINE mkPmVar #-}
-- | Generate many variable patterns, given a list of types
-mkPmVars :: [Type] -> DsM PatVec
+mkPmVars :: [Type] -> PmM PatVec
mkPmVars tys = mapM mkPmVar tys
{-# INLINE mkPmVars #-}
-- | Generate a fresh `Id` of a given type
-mkPmId :: Type -> DsM Id
+mkPmId :: Type -> PmM Id
mkPmId ty = getUniqueM >>= \unique ->
let occname = mkVarOccFS $ fsLit "$pm"
name = mkInternalName unique occname noSrcSpan
@@ -1705,7 +1709,7 @@ mkPmId ty = getUniqueM >>= \unique ->
-- | Generate a fresh term variable of a given and return it in two forms:
-- * A variable pattern
-- * A variable expression
-mkPmId2Forms :: Type -> DsM (Pattern, LHsExpr GhcTc)
+mkPmId2Forms :: Type -> PmM (Pattern, LHsExpr GhcTc)
mkPmId2Forms ty = do
x <- mkPmId ty
return (PmVar x, noLoc (HsVar noExt (noLoc x)))
@@ -1717,6 +1721,7 @@ mkPmId2Forms ty = do
vaToPmExpr :: ValAbs -> PmExpr
vaToPmExpr (PmCon { pm_con_con = c, pm_con_args = ps })
= PmExprCon c (map vaToPmExpr ps)
+vaToPmExpr (PmNCon { pm_con_id = x }) = PmExprVar (idName x)
vaToPmExpr (PmVar { pm_var_id = x }) = PmExprVar (idName x)
vaToPmExpr (PmLit { pm_lit_lit = l }) = PmExprLit l
vaToPmExpr (PmNLit { pm_lit_id = x }) = PmExprVar (idName x)
@@ -1744,9 +1749,9 @@ coercePmPat PmFake = [] -- drop the guards
-- | Check whether a 'ConLike' has the /single match/ property, i.e. whether
-- it is the only possible match in the given context. See also
-- 'allCompleteMatches' and Note [Single match constructors].
-singleMatchConstructor :: ConLike -> [Type] -> DsM Bool
+singleMatchConstructor :: ConLike -> [Type] -> PmM Bool
singleMatchConstructor cl tys =
- any (isSingleton . snd) <$> allCompleteMatches cl tys
+ any isSingleton <$> allCompleteMatches cl tys
{-
Note [Single match constructors]
@@ -1781,20 +1786,18 @@ translation step. See #15753 for why this yields surprising results.
-- 2. From `COMPLETE` pragmas which have the same type as the result
-- type constructor. Note that we only use `COMPLETE` pragmas
-- *all* of whose pattern types match. See #14135
-allCompleteMatches :: ConLike -> [Type] -> DsM [(Provenance, [ConLike])]
+allCompleteMatches :: ConLike -> [Type] -> DsM [[ConLike]]
allCompleteMatches cl tys = do
let fam = case cl of
RealDataCon dc ->
- [(FromBuiltin, map RealDataCon (tyConDataCons (dataConTyCon dc)))]
+ [map RealDataCon (tyConDataCons (dataConTyCon dc))]
PatSynCon _ -> []
ty = conLikeResTy cl tys
pragmas <- case splitTyConApp_maybe ty of
Just (tc, _) -> dsGetCompleteMatches tc
Nothing -> return []
- let fams cm = (FromComplete,) <$>
- mapM dsLookupConLike (completeMatchConLikes cm)
- from_pragma <- filter (\(_,m) -> isValidCompleteMatch ty m) <$>
- mapM fams pragmas
+ let fams cm = mapM dsLookupConLike (completeMatchConLikes cm)
+ from_pragma <- filter (isValidCompleteMatch ty) <$> mapM fams pragmas
let final_groups = fam ++ from_pragma
return final_groups
where
@@ -1886,8 +1889,7 @@ nameType name ty = do
-- | Check whether a set of type constraints is satisfiable.
tyOracle :: Bag EvVar -> PmM Bool
tyOracle evs
- = liftD $
- do { ((_warns, errs), res) <- initTcDsForSolver $ tcCheckSatisfiability evs
+ = do { ((_warns, errs), res) <- initTcDsForSolver $ tcCheckSatisfiability evs
; case res of
Just sat -> return sat
Nothing -> pprPanic "tyOracle" (vcat $ pprErrMsgBagWithLoc errs) }
@@ -1969,7 +1971,7 @@ mkInitialUncovered vars = do
-- limit is not exceeded and call `pmcheck`
pmcheckI :: PatVec -> [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult
pmcheckI ps guards vva = do
- n <- liftD incrCheckPmIterDs
+ n <- incrCheckPmIterDs
tracePm "pmCheck" (ppr n <> colon <+> pprPatVec ps
$$ hang (text "guards:") 2 (vcat (map pprPatVec guards))
$$ pprValVecDebug vva)
@@ -1981,7 +1983,7 @@ pmcheckI ps guards vva = do
-- | Increase the counter for elapsed algorithm iterations, check that the
-- limit is not exceeded and call `pmcheckGuards`
pmcheckGuardsI :: [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult
-pmcheckGuardsI gvs vva = liftD incrCheckPmIterDs >> pmcheckGuards gvs vva
+pmcheckGuardsI gvs vva = incrCheckPmIterDs >> pmcheckGuards gvs vva
{-# INLINE pmcheckGuardsI #-}
-- | Increase the counter for elapsed algorithm iterations, check that the
@@ -1989,7 +1991,7 @@ pmcheckGuardsI gvs vva = liftD incrCheckPmIterDs >> pmcheckGuards gvs vva
pmcheckHdI :: Pattern -> PatVec -> [PatVec] -> ValAbs -> ValVec
-> PmM PartialResult
pmcheckHdI p ps guards va vva = do
- n <- liftD incrCheckPmIterDs
+ n <- incrCheckPmIterDs
tracePm "pmCheckHdI" (ppr n <> colon <+> pprPmPatDebug p
$$ pprPatVec ps
$$ hang (text "guards:") 2 (vcat (map pprPatVec guards))
@@ -2019,10 +2021,13 @@ pmcheck (PmFake : ps) guards vva =
pmcheck (p : ps) guards (ValVec vas delta)
| PmGrd { pm_grd_pv = pv, pm_grd_expr = e } <- p
= do
- y <- liftD $ mkPmId (pmPatType p)
+ tracePm "PmGrd: pmPatType" (hcat [ppr p, ppr (pmPatType p)])
+ y <- mkPmId (pmPatType p)
let tm_state = extendSubst y e (delta_tm_cs delta)
delta' = delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state }
- utail <$> pmcheckI (pv ++ ps) guards (ValVec (PmVar y : vas) delta')
+ pr <- pmcheckI (pv ++ ps) guards (ValVec (PmVar y : vas) delta')
+ us <- normaliseUncovered (presultUncovered pr)
+ pure $ utail pr { presultUncovered = us }
pmcheck [] _ (ValVec (_:_) _) = panic "pmcheck: nil-cons"
pmcheck (_:_) _ (ValVec [] _) = panic "pmcheck: cons-nil"
@@ -2034,10 +2039,9 @@ pmcheck (p:ps) guards (ValVec (va:vva) delta)
pmcheckGuards :: [PatVec] -> ValVec -> PmM PartialResult
pmcheckGuards [] vva = return (usimple [vva])
pmcheckGuards (gv:gvs) vva = do
- (PartialResult prov1 cs vsa ds) <- pmcheckI gv [] vva
- (PartialResult prov2 css vsas dss) <- runMany (pmcheckGuardsI gvs) vsa
- return $ PartialResult (prov1 `mappend` prov2)
- (cs `mappend` css)
+ (PartialResult cs vsa ds) <- pmcheckI gv [] vva
+ (PartialResult css vsas dss) <- runMany (pmcheckGuardsI gvs) vsa
+ return $ PartialResult (cs `mappend` css)
vsas
(ds `mappend` dss)
@@ -2073,7 +2077,7 @@ pmcheckHd ( p@(PmCon { pm_con_con = c1, pm_con_tvs = ex_tvs1
| otherwise = Just <$> to_evvar tv1 tv2
evvars <- (listToBag . catMaybes) <$>
ASSERT(ex_tvs1 `equalLength` ex_tvs2)
- liftD (zipWithM mb_to_evvar ex_tvs1 ex_tvs2)
+ (zipWithM mb_to_evvar ex_tvs1 ex_tvs2)
let delta' = delta { delta_ty_cs = evvars `unionBags` delta_ty_cs delta }
kcon c1 (pm_con_arg_tys p) (pm_con_tvs p) (pm_con_dicts p)
<$> pmcheckI (args1 ++ ps) guards (ValVec (args2 ++ vva) delta')
@@ -2085,45 +2089,53 @@ pmcheckHd (PmLit l1) ps guards (va@(PmLit l2)) vva =
False -> return $ ucon va (usimple [vva])
-- ConVar
-pmcheckHd (p@(PmCon { pm_con_con = con, pm_con_arg_tys = tys }))
- ps guards
- (PmVar x) (ValVec vva delta) = do
- (prov, complete_match) <- select =<< liftD (allCompleteMatches con tys)
-
- cons_cs <- mapM (liftD . mkOneConFull x) complete_match
-
- inst_vsa <- flip mapMaybeM cons_cs $
- \InhabitationCandidate{ ic_val_abs = va, ic_tm_ct = tm_ct
- , ic_ty_cs = ty_cs
- , ic_strict_arg_tys = strict_arg_tys } -> do
- mb_sat <- pmIsSatisfiable delta tm_ct ty_cs strict_arg_tys
- pure $ fmap (ValVec (va:vva)) mb_sat
-
- set_provenance prov .
- force_if (canDiverge (idName x) (delta_tm_cs delta)) <$>
- runMany (pmcheckI (p:ps) guards) inst_vsa
+pmcheckHd p at PmCon{} ps guards (PmVar x) vva@(ValVec _ delta) = do
+ groups <- allCompleteMatches (pm_con_con p) (pm_con_arg_tys p)
+ force_if (canDiverge (idName x) (delta_tm_cs delta)) <$>
+ pmcheckHd p ps guards (PmNCon x groups []) vva
+
+-- ConNCon
+pmcheckHd p at PmCon{} ps guards va at PmNCon{} (ValVec vva delta) = do
+ -- Split the value vector into two value vectors: One representing the current
+ -- constructor, the other representing everything but the current constructor
+ -- (and the already known impossible constructors).
+ let con = pm_con_con p
+ let x = pm_con_id va
+ let grps = pm_con_grps va
+ let ncons = pm_con_not va
+
+ -- For the value vector of the current constructor, we directly recurse into
+ -- checking the the current case, so we get back a PartialResult
+ ic <- mkOneConFull x con
+ pr_con <- fmap (fromMaybe mempty) $ runMaybeT $ do
+ guard (con `notElem` ncons)
+ delta' <- MaybeT $ pmIsSatisfiable delta (ic_tm_ct ic) (ic_ty_cs ic) (ic_strict_arg_tys ic)
+ lift $ tracePm "success" (ppr (delta_tm_cs delta))
+ lift $ pmcheckHdI p ps guards (ic_val_abs ic) (ValVec vva delta')
+
+ let ncons' = con : ncons
+ let us_incomplete
+ | let nalt = PmAltConLike (pm_con_con p) (pm_con_arg_tys p)
+ , Just tm_state <- addSolveRefutableAltCon (delta_tm_cs delta) x nalt
+ = [ValVec (PmNCon x grps ncons' : vva) (delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state })]
+ | otherwise = []
+ us_incomplete' <- normaliseUncovered us_incomplete
+ tracePm "ConNCon" (vcat [ppr p, ppr x, ppr ncons', ppr pr_con, ppr us_incomplete, ppr us_incomplete'])
+
+ -- Combine both into a single PartialResult
+ let pr_combined = mkUnion pr_con (usimple us_incomplete')
+ pure pr_combined
-- LitVar
-pmcheckHd (p@(PmLit l)) ps guards (PmVar x) (ValVec vva delta)
+pmcheckHd p at PmLit{} ps guards (PmVar x) vva@(ValVec _ delta)
= force_if (canDiverge (idName x) (delta_tm_cs delta)) <$>
- mkUnion non_matched <$>
- case solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) (mkPosEq x l) of
- Just tm_state -> pmcheckHdI p ps guards (PmLit l) $
- ValVec vva (delta {delta_tm_cs = tm_state})
- Nothing -> return mempty
- where
- -- See Note [Refutable shapes] in TmOracle
- us | Just tm_state <- addSolveRefutableAltCon (delta_tm_cs delta) x (PmAltLit l)
- = [ValVec (PmNLit x [l] : vva) (delta { delta_tm_cs = tm_state })]
- | otherwise = []
-
- non_matched = usimple us
+ pmcheckHd p ps guards (PmNLit x []) vva
-- LitNLit
pmcheckHd (p@(PmLit l)) ps guards
(PmNLit { pm_lit_id = x, pm_lit_not = lits }) (ValVec vva delta)
| all (not . eqPmLit l) lits
- , Just tm_state <- solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) (mkPosEq x l)
+ , Just tm_state <- solveOneEq (delta_tm_cs delta) (mkPosEq x (PmExprLit l))
-- Both guards check the same so it would be sufficient to have only
-- the second one. Nevertheless, it is much cheaper to check whether
-- the literal is in the list so we check it first, to avoid calling
@@ -2149,7 +2161,7 @@ pmcheckHd (p@(PmLit l)) ps guards
-- LitCon
pmcheckHd p at PmLit{} ps guards va at PmCon{} (ValVec vva delta)
- = do y <- liftD $ mkPmId (pmPatType va)
+ = do y <- mkPmId (pmPatType va)
-- Analogous to the ConVar case, we have to case split the value
-- abstraction on possible literals. We do so by introducing a fresh
-- variable that is equated to the constructor. LitVar will then take
@@ -2160,7 +2172,7 @@ pmcheckHd p at PmLit{} ps guards va at PmCon{} (ValVec vva delta)
-- ConLit
pmcheckHd p at PmCon{} ps guards (PmLit l) (ValVec vva delta)
- = do y <- liftD $ mkPmId (pmPatType p)
+ = do y <- mkPmId (pmPatType p)
-- This desugars to the ConVar case by introducing a fresh variable that
-- is equated to the literal via a constraint. ConVar will then properly
-- case split on all possible constructors.
@@ -2172,6 +2184,10 @@ pmcheckHd p at PmCon{} ps guards (PmLit l) (ValVec vva delta)
pmcheckHd (p@(PmCon {})) ps guards (PmNLit { pm_lit_id = x }) vva
= pmcheckHdI p ps guards (PmVar x) vva
+-- LitNCon
+pmcheckHd (p@(PmLit {})) ps guards (PmNCon { pm_con_id = x }) vva
+ = pmcheckHdI p ps guards (PmVar x) vva
+
-- Impossible: handled by pmcheck
pmcheckHd PmFake _ _ _ _ = panic "pmcheckHd: Fake"
pmcheckHd (PmGrd {}) _ _ _ _ = panic "pmcheckHd: Guard"
@@ -2355,9 +2371,6 @@ force_if :: Bool -> PartialResult -> PartialResult
force_if True pres = forces pres
force_if False pres = pres
-set_provenance :: Provenance -> PartialResult -> PartialResult
-set_provenance prov pr = pr { presultProvenance = prov }
-
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- * Propagation of term constraints inwards when checking nested matches
@@ -2365,7 +2378,7 @@ set_provenance prov pr = pr { presultProvenance = prov }
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When checking a match it would be great to have all type and term information
available so we can get more precise results. For this reason we have functions
-`addDictsDs' and `addTmCsDs' in PmMonad that store in the environment type and
+`addDictsDs' and `addTmCsDs' in DsMonad that store in the environment type and
term constraints (respectively) as we go deeper.
The type constraints we propagate inwards are collected by `collectEvVarsPats'
@@ -2489,8 +2502,8 @@ substInValAbs subst = map (exprDeepLookup subst . vaToPmExpr)
dsPmWarn :: DynFlags -> DsMatchContext -> PmResult -> DsM ()
dsPmWarn dflags ctx@(DsMatchContext kind loc) pm_result
= when (flag_i || flag_u) $ do
- let exists_r = flag_i && notNull redundant && onlyBuiltin
- exists_i = flag_i && notNull inaccessible && onlyBuiltin && not is_rec_upd
+ let exists_r = flag_i && notNull redundant
+ exists_i = flag_i && notNull inaccessible && not is_rec_upd
exists_u = flag_u && (case uncovered of
TypeOfUncovered _ -> True
UncoveredPatterns u -> notNull u)
@@ -2507,8 +2520,7 @@ dsPmWarn dflags ctx@(DsMatchContext kind loc) pm_result
UncoveredPatterns candidates -> pprEqns candidates
where
PmResult
- { pmresultProvenance = prov
- , pmresultRedundant = redundant
+ { pmresultRedundant = redundant
, pmresultUncovered = uncovered
, pmresultInaccessible = inaccessible } = pm_result
@@ -2519,8 +2531,6 @@ dsPmWarn dflags ctx@(DsMatchContext kind loc) pm_result
is_rec_upd = case kind of { RecUpd -> True; _ -> False }
-- See Note [Inaccessible warnings for record updates]
- onlyBuiltin = prov == FromBuiltin
-
maxPatterns = maxUncoveredPatterns dflags
-- Print a single clause (for redundant/with-inaccessible-rhs)
@@ -2694,11 +2704,7 @@ involved.
-- Debugging Infrastructre
tracePm :: String -> SDoc -> PmM ()
-tracePm herald doc = liftD $ tracePmD herald doc
-
-
-tracePmD :: String -> SDoc -> DsM ()
-tracePmD herald doc = do
+tracePm herald doc = do
dflags <- getDynFlags
printer <- mkPrintUnqualifiedDs
liftIO $ dumpIfSet_dyn_printer printer dflags
@@ -2708,6 +2714,8 @@ tracePmD herald doc = do
pprPmPatDebug :: PmPat a -> SDoc
pprPmPatDebug (PmCon cc _arg_tys _con_tvs _con_dicts con_args)
= hsep [text "PmCon", ppr cc, hsep (map pprPmPatDebug con_args)]
+pprPmPatDebug (PmNCon x _ sets)
+ = hsep [text "PmNCon", ppr x, ppr sets]
pprPmPatDebug (PmVar vid) = text "PmVar" <+> ppr vid
pprPmPatDebug (PmLit li) = text "PmLit" <+> ppr li
pprPmPatDebug (PmNLit i nl) = text "PmNLit" <+> ppr i <+> ppr nl
@@ -2728,3 +2736,5 @@ pprValAbs ps = hang (text "ValAbs:") 2
pprValVecDebug :: ValVec -> SDoc
pprValVecDebug (ValVec vas _d) = text "ValVec" <+>
parens (pprValAbs vas)
+ $$ (ppr (delta_tm_cs _d))
+ -- $$ (ppr (delta_ty_cs _d))
=====================================
compiler/deSugar/PmExpr.hs
=====================================
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Haskell expressions (as used by the pattern matching checker) and utilities.
module PmExpr (
PmExpr(..), PmLit(..), PmAltCon(..), SimpleEq, ComplexEq, toComplex,
- eqPmLit, isNotPmExprOther, lhsExprToPmExpr, hsExprToPmExpr,
+ eqPmLit, pmExprToAlt, isNotPmExprOther, lhsExprToPmExpr, hsExprToPmExpr,
substComplexEq
) where
@@ -89,6 +89,13 @@ instance Eq PmAltCon where
PmAltLit l1 == PmAltLit l2 = eqPmLit l1 l2
_ == _ = False
+pmExprToAlt :: PmExpr -> Maybe PmAltCon
+-- Note how this deliberately chooses bogus argument types for PmAltConLike.
+-- This is only safe for doing lookup in a 'PmRefutEnv'!
+pmExprToAlt (PmExprCon cl _) = Just (PmAltConLike cl [])
+pmExprToAlt (PmExprLit l) = Just (PmAltLit l)
+pmExprToAlt _ = Nothing
+
{- Note [Undecidable Equality for Overloaded Literals]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Equality on overloaded literals is undecidable in the general case. Consider
=====================================
compiler/deSugar/TmOracle.hs
=====================================
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ module TmOracle (
-- re-exported from PmExpr
PmExpr(..), PmLit(..), PmAltCon(..), SimpleEq, ComplexEq, PmVarEnv,
- PmRefutEnv, eqPmLit, isNotPmExprOther, lhsExprToPmExpr, hsExprToPmExpr,
+ PmRefutEnv, eqPmLit, pmExprToAlt, isNotPmExprOther, lhsExprToPmExpr,
+ hsExprToPmExpr,
-- the term oracle
tmOracle, TmState, initialTmState, wrapUpTmState, solveOneEq, extendSubst, canDiverge,
@@ -31,6 +32,9 @@ import PmExpr
import Id
import Name
+import NameEnv
+import UniqFM
+import UniqDFM
import Type
import HsLit
import TcHsSyn
@@ -40,8 +44,6 @@ import Util
import Maybes
import Outputable
-import NameEnv
-
{-
%************************************************************************
%* *
@@ -97,6 +99,15 @@ data TmState = TmS
-- those of @y at .
}
+instance Outputable TmState where
+ ppr state = braces (fsep (punctuate comma (facts ++ pos ++ neg)))
+ where
+ facts = map pos_eq (tm_facts state)
+ pos = map pos_eq (nonDetUFMToList (tm_pos state))
+ neg = map neg_eq (udfmToList (tm_neg state))
+ pos_eq (l, r) = ppr l <+> char '~' <+> ppr r
+ neg_eq (l, r) = ppr l <+> char '≁' <+> ppr r
+
-- | Initial state of the oracle.
initialTmState :: TmState
initialTmState = TmS [] emptyNameEnv emptyDNameEnv
@@ -144,7 +155,7 @@ varIn x e = case e of
-- @x@ and @e@ are completely substituted before!
isRefutable :: Name -> PmExpr -> PmRefutEnv -> Bool
isRefutable x e env
- = fromMaybe False $ elem <$> exprToAlt e <*> lookupDNameEnv env x
+ = fromMaybe False $ elem <$> pmExprToAlt e <*> lookupDNameEnv env x
-- | Solve a complex equality (top-level).
solveOneEq :: TmState -> ComplexEq -> Maybe TmState
@@ -152,18 +163,11 @@ solveOneEq solver_env at TmS{ tm_pos = pos } complex
= solveComplexEq solver_env -- do the actual *merging* with existing state
$ applySubstComplexEq pos complex -- replace everything we already know
-exprToAlt :: PmExpr -> Maybe PmAltCon
--- Note how this deliberately chooses bogus argument types for PmAltConLike.
--- This is only safe for doing lookup in a 'PmRefutEnv'!
-exprToAlt (PmExprCon cl _) = Just (PmAltConLike cl [])
-exprToAlt (PmExprLit l) = Just (PmAltLit l)
-exprToAlt _ = Nothing
-
-- | Record that a particular 'Id' can't take the shape of a 'PmAltCon' in the
-- 'TmState' and return @Nothing@ if that leads to a contradiction.
addSolveRefutableAltCon :: TmState -> Id -> PmAltCon -> Maybe TmState
addSolveRefutableAltCon original at TmS{ tm_pos = pos, tm_neg = neg } x nalt
- = case exprToAlt e of
+ = case pmExprToAlt e of
Nothing -> Just extended -- Not solved yet
Just alt -- We have a solution
| alt == nalt -> Nothing -- ... which is contradictory
@@ -193,7 +197,7 @@ lookupRefutableAltCons x TmS { tm_neg = neg }
-- it to the tmstate; the result may or may not be
-- satisfiable
solveComplexEq :: TmState -> ComplexEq -> Maybe TmState
-solveComplexEq solver_state eq@(e1, e2) = case eq of
+solveComplexEq solver_state eq@(e1, e2) = {-pprTraceWith "solveComplexEq" (\mb_sat -> ppr eq $$ ppr mb_sat) $-} case eq of
-- We cannot do a thing about these cases
(PmExprOther _,_) -> Just solver_state
(_,PmExprOther _) -> Just solver_state
=====================================
compiler/utils/Binary.hs
=====================================
@@ -724,7 +724,6 @@ putTypeRep bh (Fun arg res) = do
put_ bh (3 :: Word8)
putTypeRep bh arg
putTypeRep bh res
-putTypeRep _ _ = fail "Binary.putTypeRep: Impossible"
getSomeTypeRep :: BinHandle -> IO SomeTypeRep
getSomeTypeRep bh = do
=====================================
compiler/utils/Outputable.hs
=====================================
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ module Outputable (
-- * Error handling and debugging utilities
pprPanic, pprSorry, assertPprPanic, pprPgmError,
- pprTrace, pprTraceDebug, pprTraceIt, warnPprTrace, pprSTrace,
- pprTraceException, pprTraceM,
+ pprTrace, pprTraceDebug, pprTraceWith, pprTraceIt, warnPprTrace,
+ pprSTrace, pprTraceException, pprTraceM,
trace, pgmError, panic, sorry, assertPanic,
pprDebugAndThen, callStackDoc,
) where
@@ -1196,9 +1196,15 @@ pprTrace str doc x
pprTraceM :: Applicative f => String -> SDoc -> f ()
pprTraceM str doc = pprTrace str doc (pure ())
+-- | @pprTraceWith desc f x@ is equivalent to @pprTrace desc (f x) x at .
+-- This allows you to print details from the returned value as well as from
+-- ambient variables.
+pprTraceWith :: Outputable a => String -> (a -> SDoc) -> a -> a
+pprTraceWith desc f x = pprTrace desc (f x) x
+
-- | @pprTraceIt desc x@ is equivalent to @pprTrace desc (ppr x) x@
pprTraceIt :: Outputable a => String -> a -> a
-pprTraceIt desc x = pprTrace desc (ppr x) x
+pprTraceIt desc x = pprTraceWith desc ppr x
-- | @pprTraceException desc x action@ runs action, printing a message
-- if it throws an exception.
=====================================
docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.rst
=====================================
@@ -15419,49 +15419,6 @@ the user must provide a type signature. ::
foo :: [a] -> Int
foo T = 5
-.. _multiple-complete-pragmas:
-
-Disambiguating between multiple ``COMPLETE`` pragmas
-----------------------------------------------------
-
-What should happen if there are multiple ``COMPLETE`` sets that apply to a
-single set of patterns? Consider this example: ::
-
- data T = MkT1 | MkT2 | MkT2Internal
- {-# COMPLETE MkT1, MkT2 #-}
- {-# COMPLETE MkT1, MkT2Internal #-}
-
- f :: T -> Bool
- f MkT1 = True
- f MkT2 = False
-
-Which ``COMPLETE`` pragma should be used when checking the coverage of the
-patterns in ``f``? If we pick the ``COMPLETE`` set that covers ``MkT1`` and
-``MkT2``, then ``f`` is exhaustive, but if we pick the other ``COMPLETE`` set
-that covers ``MkT1`` and ``MkT2Internal``, then ``f`` is *not* exhaustive,
-since it fails to match ``MkT2Internal``. An intuitive way to solve this
-dilemma is to recognize that picking the former ``COMPLETE`` set produces the
-fewest number of uncovered pattern clauses, and thus is the better choice.
-
-GHC disambiguates between multiple ``COMPLETE`` sets based on this rationale.
-To make things more formal, when the pattern-match checker requests a set of
-constructors for some data type constructor ``T``, the checker returns:
-
-* The original set of data constructors for ``T``
-* Any ``COMPLETE`` sets of type ``T``
-
-GHC then checks for pattern coverage using each of these sets. If any of these
-sets passes the pattern coverage checker with no warnings, then we are done. If
-each set produces at least one warning, then GHC must pick one of the sets of
-warnings depending on how good the results are. The results are prioritized in
-this order:
-
-1. Fewest uncovered clauses
-2. Fewest redundant clauses
-3. Fewest inaccessible clauses
-4. Whether the match comes from the original set of data constructors or from a
- ``COMPLETE`` pragma (prioritizing the former over the latter)
-
.. _overlap-pragma:
``OVERLAPPING``, ``OVERLAPPABLE``, ``OVERLAPS``, and ``INCOHERENT`` pragmas
=====================================
libraries/binary
=====================================
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit 94855814e2e4f7a0f191ffa5b4c98ee0147e3174
+Subproject commit e707cab7cb61bebd311632fd46d508ef2f524c6e
=====================================
testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363a.hs
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{-# LANGUAGE PatternSynonyms #-}
+
+module Lib where
+
+data Boolean = F | T
+ deriving Eq
+
+pattern TooGoodToBeTrue :: Boolean
+pattern TooGoodToBeTrue = T
+{-# COMPLETE F, TooGoodToBeTrue #-}
+
+catchAll :: Boolean -> Int
+catchAll F = 0
+catchAll TooGoodToBeTrue = 1
+catchAll _ = error "impossible"
=====================================
testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363a.stderr
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363a.hs:15:1: warning: [-Woverlapping-patterns]
+ Pattern match is redundant
+ In an equation for `catchAll': catchAll _ = ...
+ |
+14 | catchAll _ = error "impossible"
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
=====================================
testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363b.hs
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{-# LANGUAGE PatternSynonyms #-}
+
+module Lib where
+
+data T = A | B | C
+ deriving Eq
+
+pattern BC :: T
+pattern BC = C
+
+{-# COMPLETE A, BC #-}
+
+f A = 1
+f B = 2
+f BC = 3
+f _ = error "impossible"
=====================================
testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363b.stderr
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/T13363b.hs:16:1: warning: [-Woverlapping-patterns]
+ Pattern match is redundant
+ In an equation for `f': f _ = ...
+ |
+16 | f _ = error "impossible"
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
=====================================
testsuite/tests/pmcheck/complete_sigs/all.T
=====================================
@@ -15,3 +15,5 @@ test('completesig14', normal, compile, [''])
test('completesig15', normal, compile_fail, [''])
test('T14059a', normal, compile, [''])
test('T14253', expect_broken(14253), compile, [''])
+test('T13363a', normal, compile, ['-Wall'])
+test('T13363b', normal, compile, ['-Wall'])
=====================================
testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/pmc008.hs
=====================================
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fwarn-incomplete-patterns -fwarn-overlapping-patterns #-}
+
+module PMC008 where
+
+-- complete match, but because of the guard, the information that `x` is not
+-- `Just` has to flow through the term oracle.
+foo :: Maybe Int -> Int
+foo x | Just y <- x = y
+foo Nothing = 43
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/commit/2f3b8824d6b55426aa560887e82149903fef6882
--
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/commit/2f3b8824d6b55426aa560887e82149903fef6882
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.haskell.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/attachments/20190527/1f398b55/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ghc-commits
mailing list