[commit: ghc] ghc-7.10: Care with impossible-cons in combineIdenticalAlts (558eb05)
git at git.haskell.org
git at git.haskell.org
Thu Jun 18 15:34:48 UTC 2015
Repository : ssh://git@git.haskell.org/ghc
On branch : ghc-7.10
Link : http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/558eb05053f2cec20acca1e0a244094c46048bdc/ghc
>---------------------------------------------------------------
commit 558eb05053f2cec20acca1e0a244094c46048bdc
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Date: Thu Jun 18 08:51:08 2015 +0100
Care with impossible-cons in combineIdenticalAlts
This was a nasty, long-standing bug exposed in Trac #10538.
Symptoms were that we had an empty case
case (x :: Either a) of {}
Core Lint correctly picked this bogus code up.
Here is what happened
* In SimplUtils.prepareAlts, we call
filterAlts
then
combineIdenticalAlts
* We had case x of { Left _ -> e1; Right _ -> e1 }
* filterAlts did nothing, but correctly retuned imposs_deflt_cons
saying that 'x' cannot be {Left, Right} in the DEFAULT branch,
if any (there isn't one.)
* combineIdentialAlts correctly combines the identical alts, to give
case x of { DEFAULT -> e1 }
* BUT combineIdenticalAlts did no adjust imposs_deft_cons
* Result: when compiling e1 we did so in the belief that 'x'
could not be {Left,Right}. Disaster.
Easily fixed.
(It is hard to trigger; I can't construct a simple test case.)
(cherry picked from commit 023a0ba938b69bbb89cb2ce48a07459b07783391)
>---------------------------------------------------------------
558eb05053f2cec20acca1e0a244094c46048bdc
compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.hs | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.hs b/compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.hs
index 115d249..a768be4 100644
--- a/compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.hs
+++ b/compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.hs
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ import MonadUtils
import Outputable
import FastString
import Pair
+import ListSetOps ( minusList )
import Control.Monad ( when )
import Data.List ( partition )
@@ -1669,23 +1670,23 @@ prepareAlts scrut case_bndr' alts
-- OutId, it has maximum information; this is important.
-- Test simpl013 is an example
= do { us <- getUniquesM
- ; let (imposs_deflt_cons, refined_deflt, alts')
+ ; let (imposs_deflt_cons', refined_deflt, alts')
= filterAlts us (varType case_bndr') imposs_cons alts
- ; when refined_deflt $ tick (FillInCaseDefault case_bndr')
-
- ; alts'' <- combineIdenticalAlts case_bndr' alts'
- ; return (imposs_deflt_cons, alts'') }
+ (combining_done, imposs_deflt_cons'', alts'')
+ = combineIdenticalAlts imposs_deflt_cons' alts'
+ ; when refined_deflt $ tick (FillInCaseDefault case_bndr')
+ ; when combining_done $ tick (AltMerge case_bndr')
+ ; return (imposs_deflt_cons'', alts'') }
where
imposs_cons = case scrut of
Var v -> otherCons (idUnfolding v)
_ -> []
-{-
-Note [Combine identical alternatives]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- If several alternatives are identical, merge them into
- a single DEFAULT alternative. I've occasionally seen this
- making a big difference:
+{- Note [Combine identical alternatives]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+If several alternatives are identical, merge them into a single
+DEFAULT alternative. I've occasionally seen this making a big
+difference:
case e of =====> case e of
C _ -> f x D v -> ....v....
@@ -1723,23 +1724,49 @@ NB: it's important that all this is done in [InAlt], *before* we work
on the alternatives themselves, because Simpify.simplAlt may zap the
occurrence info on the binders in the alternatives, which in turn
defeats combineIdenticalAlts (see Trac #7360).
+
+Note [Care with impossible-constructors when combining alternatives]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Suppose we have (Trac #10538)
+ data T = A | B | C
+
+ ... case x::T of
+ DEFAULT -> e1
+ A -> e2
+ B -> e1
+
+When calling combineIdentialAlts, we'll have computed that the "impossible
+constructors" for the DEFAULT alt is {A,B}, since if x is A or B we'll
+take the other alternatives. But suppose we combine B into the DEFAULT,
+to get
+ ... case x::T of
+ DEFAULT -> e1
+ A -> e2
+Then we must be careful to trim the impossible constructors to just {A},
+else we risk compiling 'e1' wrong!
-}
-combineIdenticalAlts :: OutId -> [InAlt] -> SimplM [InAlt]
+
+combineIdenticalAlts :: [AltCon] -> [InAlt] -> (Bool, [AltCon], [InAlt])
-- See Note [Combine identical alternatives]
-combineIdenticalAlts case_bndr ((_con1,bndrs1,rhs1) : con_alts)
+-- See Note [Care with impossible-constructors when combining alternatives]
+-- True <=> we did some combining, result is a single DEFAULT alternative
+combineIdenticalAlts imposs_cons ((_con1,bndrs1,rhs1) : con_alts)
| all isDeadBinder bndrs1 -- Remember the default
, not (null eliminated_alts) -- alternative comes first
- = do { tick (AltMerge case_bndr)
- ; return ((DEFAULT, [], mkTicks (concat tickss) rhs1) : filtered_alts) }
+ = (True, imposs_cons', deflt_alt : filtered_alts)
where
(eliminated_alts, filtered_alts) = partition identical_to_alt1 con_alts
+ deflt_alt = (DEFAULT, [], mkTicks (concat tickss) rhs1)
+ imposs_cons' = imposs_cons `minusList` map fstOf3 eliminated_alts
+
cheapEqTicked e1 e2 = cheapEqExpr' tickishFloatable e1 e2
identical_to_alt1 (_con,bndrs,rhs)
= all isDeadBinder bndrs && rhs `cheapEqTicked` rhs1
tickss = map (stripTicksT tickishFloatable . thirdOf3) eliminated_alts
-combineIdenticalAlts _ alts = return alts
+combineIdenticalAlts imposs_cons alts
+ = (False, imposs_cons, alts)
{-
************************************************************************
More information about the ghc-commits
mailing list