[commit: ghc] master: Eliminate the final two calls to xCtEvidence (fd97d2a)

git at git.haskell.org git at git.haskell.org
Fri Jan 2 12:34:28 UTC 2015


Repository : ssh://git@git.haskell.org/ghc

On branch  : master
Link       : http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/fd97d2a77599e7f4a6e5c01bc7da9b12bd676e21/ghc

>---------------------------------------------------------------

commit fd97d2a77599e7f4a6e5c01bc7da9b12bd676e21
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 31 10:02:24 2014 +0000

    Eliminate the final two calls to xCtEvidence
    
    I always found calls to TcCanonical.xCtEvidence hard to grok; and I
    found that we only had two left. This patch eliminates them, along
    with xCtEvidence, its accompanying comments, and the auxiliary
    XEvTerm type.
    
    The two remaining calls were these:
    
     * One was in newSCWorkFromFlavored, where we'd already done
       case-splitting for given/wanted/derived.  So inlining the xCtEvidence
       made the code simpler, clearer, and faster.
    
     * The other was in canTuple; here all of xCtEvidence's functionality
       was needed, but inlining again made a net gain in code size and
       clarity.


>---------------------------------------------------------------

fd97d2a77599e7f4a6e5c01bc7da9b12bd676e21
 compiler/typecheck/TcCanonical.hs | 82 ++++++++++++---------------------------
 compiler/typecheck/TcSMonad.hs    |  9 -----
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcCanonical.hs b/compiler/typecheck/TcCanonical.hs
index ee8b201..a5b0d99 100644
--- a/compiler/typecheck/TcCanonical.hs
+++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcCanonical.hs
@@ -186,13 +186,27 @@ canEvNC ev
 -}
 
 canTuple :: CtEvidence -> [PredType] -> TcS (StopOrContinue Ct)
-canTuple ev tys
-  = do { traceTcS "can_pred" (text "TuplePred!")
-       ; let xcomp = EvTupleMk
-             xdecomp x = zipWith (\_ i -> EvTupleSel x i) tys [0..]
-       ; xCtEvidence ev (XEvTerm tys xcomp xdecomp)
+canTuple ev preds
+  | CtWanted { ctev_evar = evar, ctev_loc = loc } <- ev
+  = do { new_evars <- mapM (newWantedEvVar loc) preds
+       ; setEvBind evar (EvTupleMk (map (ctEvTerm . fst) new_evars))
+       ; emitWorkNC (freshGoals new_evars)
+         -- Note the "NC": these are fresh goals, not necessarily canonical
+       ; stopWith ev "Decomposed tuple constraint" }
+
+  | CtGiven { ctev_evtm = tm, ctev_loc = loc } <- ev
+  = do { let mk_pr pred i = (pred, EvTupleSel tm i)
+       ; given_evs <- newGivenEvVars loc (zipWith mk_pr preds [0..])
+       ; emitWorkNC given_evs
+       ; stopWith ev "Decomposed tuple constraint" }
+
+  | CtDerived { ctev_loc = loc } <- ev
+  = do { mapM_ (emitNewDerived loc) preds
        ; stopWith ev "Decomposed tuple constraint" }
 
+  | otherwise = panic "canTuple"
+
+
 {-
 ************************************************************************
 *                                                                      *
@@ -339,13 +353,11 @@ newSCWorkFromFlavored flavor cls xis
   = return ()  -- Deriveds don't yield more superclasses because we will
                -- add them transitively in the case of wanteds.
 
-  | isGiven flavor
+  | CtGiven { ctev_evtm = ev_tm, ctev_loc = loc } <- flavor
   = do { let sc_theta = immSuperClasses cls xis
-             xev_decomp x = zipWith (\_ i -> EvSuperClass x i) sc_theta [0..]
-             xev = XEvTerm { ev_preds  =  sc_theta
-                           , ev_comp   = panic "Can't compose for given!"
-                           , ev_decomp = xev_decomp }
-       ; xCtEvidence flavor xev }
+             mk_pr sc_pred i = (sc_pred, EvSuperClass ev_tm i)
+       ; given_evs <- newGivenEvVars loc (zipWith mk_pr sc_theta [0..])
+       ; emitWorkNC given_evs }
 
   | isEmptyVarSet (tyVarsOfTypes xis)
   = return () -- Wanteds with no variables yield no deriveds.
@@ -683,8 +695,7 @@ try_decompose_nom_app ev ty1 ty2
    | otherwise  -- Neither is an AppTy
    = canEqNC ev NomEq ty1 ty2
    where
-     -- do_decompose is like xCtEvidence, but recurses
-     -- to try_decompose_nom_app to decompose a chain of AppTys
+     -- Recurses to try_decompose_nom_app to decompose a chain of AppTys
      do_decompose s1 t1 s2 t2
        | CtDerived { ctev_loc = loc } <- ev
        = do { emitNewDerived loc (mkTcEqPred t1 t2)
@@ -1359,31 +1370,6 @@ itself, and so on.  See Note [Occurs check expansion] in TcType
 -}
 
 {-
-Note [xCtEvidence]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-A call might look like this:
-
-    xCtEvidence ev evidence-transformer
-
-  ev is Given   => use ev_decomp to create new Givens for ev_preds,
-                   and return them
-
-  ev is Wanted  => create new wanteds for ev_preds,
-                   use ev_comp to bind ev,
-                   return fresh wanteds (ie ones not cached in inert_cans or solved)
-
-  ev is Derived => create new deriveds for ev_preds
-                      (unless cached in inert_cans or solved)
-
-Note: The [CtEvidence] returned is a subset of the subgoal-preds passed in
-      Ones that are already cached are not returned
-
-Example
-    ev : Tree a b ~ Tree c d
-    xCtEvidence ev [a~c, b~d] (XEvTerm { ev_comp = \[c1 c2]. <Tree> c1 c2
-                                       , ev_decomp = \c. [nth 1 c, nth 2 c] })
-              (\fresh-goals.  stuff)
-
 Note [Bind new Givens immediately]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 For Givens we make new EvVars and bind them immediately. We don't worry
@@ -1398,26 +1384,6 @@ But that superclass selector can't (yet) appear in a coercion
 See Note [Coercion evidence terms] in TcEvidence.
 -}
 
-xCtEvidence :: CtEvidence            -- Original evidence
-            -> XEvTerm               -- Instructions about how to manipulate evidence
-            -> TcS ()
-
-xCtEvidence (CtWanted { ctev_evar = evar, ctev_loc = loc })
-            (XEvTerm { ev_preds = ptys, ev_comp = comp_fn })
-  = do { new_evars <- mapM (newWantedEvVar loc) ptys
-       ; setEvBind evar (comp_fn (map (ctEvTerm . fst) new_evars))
-       ; emitWorkNC (freshGoals new_evars) }
-         -- Note the "NC": these are fresh goals, not necessarily canonical
-
-xCtEvidence (CtGiven { ctev_evtm = tm, ctev_loc = loc })
-            (XEvTerm { ev_preds = ptys, ev_decomp = decomp_fn })
-  = ASSERT( equalLength ptys (decomp_fn tm) )
-    do { given_evs <- newGivenEvVars loc (ptys `zip` decomp_fn tm)
-       ; emitWorkNC given_evs }
-
-xCtEvidence (CtDerived { ctev_loc = loc })
-            (XEvTerm { ev_preds = ptys })
-  = mapM_ (emitNewDerived loc) ptys
 
 -----------------------------
 data StopOrContinue a
diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcSMonad.hs b/compiler/typecheck/TcSMonad.hs
index 56c8a9a..d62f098 100644
--- a/compiler/typecheck/TcSMonad.hs
+++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcSMonad.hs
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ module TcSMonad (
     wrapErrTcS, wrapWarnTcS,
 
     -- Evidence creation and transformation
-    XEvTerm(..),
     Freshness(..), freshGoals, isFresh,
 
     newTcEvBinds, newWantedEvVar, newWantedEvVarNC,
@@ -1752,14 +1751,6 @@ instFlexiTcSHelperTcS n k = wrapTcS (instFlexiTcSHelper n k)
 -- Creating and setting evidence variables and CtFlavors
 -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-data XEvTerm
-  = XEvTerm { ev_preds  :: [PredType]           -- New predicate types
-            , ev_comp   :: [EvTerm] -> EvTerm   -- How to compose evidence
-            , ev_decomp :: EvTerm -> [EvTerm]   -- How to decompose evidence
-            -- In both ev_comp and ev_decomp, the [EvTerm] is 1-1 with ev_preds
-            -- and each EvTerm has type of the corresponding EvPred
-            }
-
 data Freshness = Fresh | Cached
 
 isFresh :: Freshness -> Bool



More information about the ghc-commits mailing list