[commit: ghc] master: Typos in comments (d6ccea9)

[git at git.haskell.org]

Repository : ssh://git at git.haskell.org/ghc

On branch  : master
Link       : http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/d6ccea98624fd78f8d0c96d9053d881b825cfd34/ghc

>---------------------------------------------------------------

commit d6ccea98624fd78f8d0c96d9053d881b825cfd34
Author: Gabor Greif <ggreif at gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 1 21:44:23 2013 +0200

    Typos in comments


>---------------------------------------------------------------

d6ccea98624fd78f8d0c96d9053d881b825cfd34
 compiler/basicTypes/Demand.lhs |    6 +++---
 compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y        |    4 ++--
 compiler/main/DynFlags.hs      |    2 +-
 compiler/types/FunDeps.lhs     |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/compiler/basicTypes/Demand.lhs b/compiler/basicTypes/Demand.lhs
index 516dbb8..796c7cd 100644
--- a/compiler/basicTypes/Demand.lhs
+++ b/compiler/basicTypes/Demand.lhs
@@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ dmdTransformDictSelSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ [dict_dmd] _)) cd
    , Just jds <- splitProdDmd_maybe dict_dmd
    = DmdType emptyDmdEnv [mkManyUsedDmd $ mkProdDmd $ map (enhance cd') jds] topRes
    | otherwise
-   = topDmdType              -- See Note [Demand transformer for a ditionary selector]
+   = topDmdType              -- See Note [Demand transformer for a dictionary selector]
   where
     enhance cd old | isAbsDmd old = old
                    | otherwise    = mkManyUsedDmd cd
@@ -1330,7 +1330,7 @@ dmdTransformDictSelSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ [dict_dmd] _)) cd
 dmdTransformDictSelSig _ _ = panic "dmdTransformDictSelSig: no args"
 \end{code}
 
-Note [Demand transformer for a ditionary selector]
+Note [Demand transformer for a dictionary selector]
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 If we evaluate (op dict-expr) under demand 'd', then we can push the demand 'd'
 into the appropriate field of the dictionary. What *is* the appropriate field?
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ ghc --make; and the first module has a local -O0 flag.  So you may load a class
 without interface pragmas, ie (currently) without an unfolding for the class
 ops.   Now if a subsequent module in the --make sweep has a local -O flag
 you might do strictness analysis, but there is no inlining for the class op.
-This is wierd so I'm not worried about whether this optimises brilliantly; but
+This is weird, so I'm not worried about whether this optimises brilliantly; but
 it should not fall over.
 
 Note [Non-full application] 
diff --git a/compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y b/compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y
index 5f97bfd..ebd9278 100644
--- a/compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y
+++ b/compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y
@@ -122,9 +122,9 @@ be anything at all.
 If a low-level procedure implements the NativeNode calling convention,
 then it can be called by high-level code using an ordinary function
 call.  In general this is hard to arrange because the calling
-convention depends on the number of physical register available for
+convention depends on the number of physical registers available for
 parameter passing, but there are two cases where the calling
-convention is platform-independnt:
+convention is platform-independent:
 
  - Zero arguments.
 
diff --git a/compiler/main/DynFlags.hs b/compiler/main/DynFlags.hs
index d52835d..d651d25 100644
--- a/compiler/main/DynFlags.hs
+++ b/compiler/main/DynFlags.hs
@@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@ wayGeneralFlags _ WayDebug    = []
 wayGeneralFlags _ WayDyn      = [Opt_PIC]
     -- We could get away without adding -fPIC when compiling the
     -- modules of a program that is to be linked with -dynamic; the
-    -- program itself does not need to be position-independet, only
+    -- program itself does not need to be position-independent, only
     -- the libraries need to be.  HOWEVER, GHCi links objects into a
     -- .so before loading the .so using the system linker.  Since only
     -- PIC objects can be linked into a .so, we have to compile even
diff --git a/compiler/types/FunDeps.lhs b/compiler/types/FunDeps.lhs
index 2d4fa39..8f255b7 100644
--- a/compiler/types/FunDeps.lhs
+++ b/compiler/types/FunDeps.lhs
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ instFD (ls,rs) tvs tys
 checkInstCoverage :: Bool   -- Be liberal
                   -> Class -> [PredType] -> [Type]
                   -> Maybe SDoc
--- "be_liberal" flag says whether to use "liberal" coveragek of
+-- "be_liberal" flag says whether to use "liberal" coverage of
 --              See Note [Coverage Condition] below
 --
 -- Return values