[Freebsd-haskell] Development Plans

Jacula Modyun jacula at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 16:43:57 EST 2009


Hi Samy,

Here I have to repeat myself, sorry: my first question is how I could become a named
developer in this team like the current developers:

	Ashish Shukla, Gabor Pali, Samy Al Bahra.

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Gabor Pali <pgj at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
 
> I do not know who is maintaining the effort's web page, but I would
> point to Samy.  He is the administrator here.  I do not have any
> objection to include you.  The more developer we have, the more we can
> progress.

http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/freebsd-haskell/2009-January/000015.html

then I ask you if this is possible in some way.


On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 07:14:29PM -0500, Samy Al Bahra <sbahra at applicative.org> wrote:

> A majority of our infrastructure is now ready to begin collaborating our
> FreeBSD Haskell efforts. I present here a proposal for collaborating our
> work in the git repository[1].
 
Great! :-)

> The following branches seem to be necessary,

> master branch)
>
> 
> ports branch)
> 
> ghc branch)
> 
> infrastructure branch)
> This branch would contain our experimental work with bsd.haskell.mk. 

This sequence and the corresponding functions are OK for me, the idea is
very good and manageable. About the bsd.haskell.mk (also here I have to
repeat myself) I'd like you could take in consideration my old propose and
my new one:

old:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/124047

new:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/126012
 
The new propose is working and you can install, with it, also the WxHaskell
libraries.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:30:59AM +0530, Ashish SHUKLA <wahjava.ml at gmail.com> wrote:

> And there is another question, whether we can create extra branches
> (for personal use, e.g. the stuff which we want to commit (because we
> prefer redundant backup) but is not suitable for merging with "ports"
> branch) other than the four important branches. Hmm..? I don't think
> this will be any issue but just wanted to be sure.
 
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/freebsd-haskell/2009-January/000018.html

I am in agreement with this proposal.

Thanks!

Giuseppe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/freebsd-haskell/attachments/20090121/3a61efa6/attachment.bin


More information about the FreeBSD-haskell mailing list