addFinalizer to which object? (fwd from cafe)
Henning Thielemann
lemming at henning-thielemann.de
Fri Jan 22 10:26:16 EST 2010
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Henning Thielemann wrote:
> The documentation of System.Mem.Weak.addFinalizer suggests to me, that this
> function is very fragile, because the object we track, might be optimized
> away. ...
After even more web search I found the bytestring-mmap package that
brought my attention to the module Foreign.Concurrent. This actually
solves my problem! I would like to have pointers in System.Mem.Weak and
Foreign.ForeignPtr to this module, otherwise it is very hard to find! The
function names in this module are so similar to Foreign.ForeignPtr that it
is likely that you do not even recognize easily that it is actually
different functionality, not only the same functionality for concurrent
applications.
I would also like to read about examples, where
System.Mem.Weak.addFinalizer can be actually used and does not interfer
unexpectedly with unboxing. If there is no such example there might be a
warning like "addFinalizer is certainly not, what you are looking for" or
a DEPRECATED flag.
More information about the FFI
mailing list