ForeignPtr naming

[Manuel M T Chakravarty]

"Simon Marlow" <simonmar at microsoft.com> wrote,

> > As Haskell finalizers need pre-emptive concurrency, maybe
> > they should go somewhere related to concurrency.  Or we
> > could have a "Foreign.Concurrent".
> 
> Ok, how about Foreign.Concurrent.newForeignPtr and
> Foreign.Concurrent.addForeignPtrFinalizer?  i.e. dodging the naming
> issue by using the module system.  It also means that code which uses
> GHC's existing versions of these functions can be fixed by changing
> imports only.

Sounds good to me.

Cheers,
Manuel