new ForeignPtr without finalizers

Ashley Yakeley ashley at semantic.org
Mon Jun 9 06:44:26 EDT 2003


In article <20030609095549.1614e710.Malcolm.Wallace at cs.york.ac.uk>,
 Malcolm Wallace <Malcolm.Wallace at cs.york.ac.uk> wrote:

> Why would you want to?
> 
> A ForeignPtr without any finalizers is semantically just a Ptr,
> plain and simple.

I need a pointer type for which some values have finalizers, and some 
don't.

-- 
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA




More information about the FFI mailing list