module Data.Bits
Alastair Reid
alastair at reid-consulting-uk.ltd.uk
Tue Sep 10 10:09:56 EDT 2002
> Errm, but in C there is no unified shift operator. You have << for
> left shift and and >> for right shift, and a negative shift is
> undefined.
[blush]
>> This makes the specification come out nice and clean - you're
>> multiplying the number by 2^n instead of 2^{-n}.
> Errm, but then right shift comes out as dividing by 2^{-n}, instead
> of 2^n. For a unified shift operation, I don't think there is any
> good reason to prefer one direction over the other, since there is
> no precedent in another language (AFAIK).
I think this spec (for >0 == left shift)
shift x n = x * 2^^n
is simpler than (for >0 == right shift)
shift x n = x * 2^^(-n)
[Ok, I probably need a few from/to Fractionals added to those specs]
--
A
More information about the FFI
mailing list