Manuel M T Chakravarty
chak at cse.unsw.edu.au
Tue Sep 3 04:42:58 EDT 2002
"Simon Peyton-Jones" <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote,
> | .NET is a different beast from other calling conventions in
> | that you may want to compile Haskell ccalls to .NET
> | intermediate language. In other words, it is about being
> | able to implement ccall *on* .NET. Thus, the mix.
> I think that is exactly the issue.
> | At the moment, there doesn't seem to be much support for
> | [lib]. The last message from SimonPJ (a while ago) on this
> | issues also seems to indicate that he isn't to bothered about
> | it. But AFAIK he is away at the moment.
> So let's omit it for now; but we will need to think about what to
> do when someone really does do a Haskell-on-.NET binding.
So, overall this point is settled, then; implying that we
stick with Alastair's recent change of the spec in that
More information about the FFI