simonmar at microsoft.com
Mon Nov 18 06:48:26 EST 2002
> That's what I expected. Would it be possible to include the
> new functions
> in 5.04.2? OK, that's an API change, too, but simple
> additions are rather
> harmless. If we don't include this stuff now, there is no
> useful common ForeignObj API for GHC/Hugs/NHC in the near future.
Ok, I suppose we could bend the rules a little in this case, as long as
we don't change the behaviour of any existing functions.
> > [...] Also still unresolved is what to do about
> atomicModifyIORef and
> > friends, BTW.
> I remember atomicModifyIORef, but what are its "friends"
> exactly? PVars
> have died, IIRC, and some cunning constraints on the
> execution order of
> finalizers were rejected, too.
There was this, from Dean Herrington:
I don't have any strong feelings (I rarely do, where names are
More information about the FFI