DLL spec [ was: FFI Report, CVS Id 1.5 ]
trd at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Sat Jun 23 01:57:36 EDT 2001
On 18-Jun-2001, Sven Panne <Sven_Panne at BetaResearch.de> wrote:
> Manuel wrote:
> > [...] I'd prefer to complicate the ccall entity description
> > slightly and go for
> > foreign import ccall "myheader.h foo at mylib" foo :: Int -> Int
> > [...] Any objections?
> I'd favour this, too. Just a very minor note: If there is a "::"-syntax
> for this already on .NET, we should adopt this instead of "@". I'm not
> sure about this or similar lexical conventions on other platforms, though.
.NET is a runtime platform, it doesn't really have any syntax.
There is a convention for using "." for namespace separators that is
pretty much baked into the system. But apart from that, there's no
syntax save what programming languages decide upon.
Tyson Dowd #
# Surreal humour isn't everyone's cup of fur.
trd at cs.mu.oz.au #
More information about the FFI