Summary of current change suggestions
simonmar at microsoft.com
Thu Feb 22 06:55:32 EST 2001
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > The package spec format is designed to be used with "read"
> (i.e. it's
> > Haskell syntax), so Hugs could just read it using its
> built-in parser.
> The format should be extensible, i.e. adding future fields should not
> break old code which does not use these fields. IMHO each field which
> is a list should be allowed to be skipped, defaulting to the
> empty list.
yep, good point.
More information about the FFI