Haddock version during build

[David Waern]

2008/6/16 Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li>:
> But if you don't rehaddock them then their haddocks still have that bug
> that you fixed, or still miss that feature that you added. (Unless the
> bug/feature only affects features that the bootlibs don't use).

Ah, true. So let's scrap backwards-compatibility.

But couldn't one re-haddock the boot libs by letting cabal-install
re-install their documentation? This would similar to upgrading the
boot-libs after a GHC installation. Then it would still be meaningful
to upgrade Haddock separately.

David