patch applied (ghc-6.8/packages/bytestring): Bump version to
0.9.0.2
Don Stewart
dons at galois.com
Mon Jun 2 13:24:37 EDT 2008
duncan.coutts:
>
> On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 16:59 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
>
> > > So I think either ghc-6.8.3 should use the existing bytestring-0.9.0.4
> > > release or we should do another bytestring-0.9.0.5 release with the
> > > fixes but without the api addition.
> >
> > Or ghc 6.8.3 could not bump their bytestring branch, if there were no
> > changes.
>
> There has been one change since ghc-6.8.2:
>
> Sun Jun 1 19:14:51 BST 2008 Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li>
> * Bump version to 0.9.0.2
>
> Fri May 16 14:07:29 BST 2008 simonpj at microsoft.com
> * Remove bogus rule for seq
>
> I'm removing a rule for seq that Don and Roman say is a vestige
> of old code, and which doesn't work with the new desugaring for
> seq.
>
>
> Sat Dec 15 15:48:51 GMT 2007 Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li>
> tagged GHC 6.8.2 release
>
>
> Did the new desugaring for seq get included into ghc-6.8.3 or just 6.9?
> If the latter then this patch is not needed and no version bump is
> required.
And the patch wasn't needed anyway -- it was a patch to dead code.
-- Don
More information about the Cvs-libraries
mailing list