patch applied (ghc-6.8/packages/bytestring): Bump version to 0.9.0.2

Don Stewart dons at galois.com
Mon Jun 2 13:24:37 EDT 2008


duncan.coutts:
> 
> On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 16:59 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> 
> > > So I think either ghc-6.8.3 should use the existing bytestring-0.9.0.4
> > > release or we should do another bytestring-0.9.0.5 release with the
> > > fixes but without the api addition.
> > 
> > Or ghc 6.8.3 could not bump their bytestring branch, if there were no
> > changes.
> 
> There has been one change since ghc-6.8.2:
> 
> Sun Jun  1 19:14:51 BST 2008  Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li>
>   * Bump version to 0.9.0.2
> 
> Fri May 16 14:07:29 BST 2008  simonpj at microsoft.com
>   * Remove bogus rule for seq
>   
>   I'm removing a rule for seq that Don and Roman say is a vestige
>   of old code, and which doesn't work with the new desugaring for
>   seq.
>   
> 
> Sat Dec 15 15:48:51 GMT 2007  Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li>
>   tagged GHC 6.8.2 release
> 
> 
> Did the new desugaring for seq get included into ghc-6.8.3 or just 6.9?
> If the latter then this patch is not needed and no version bump is
> required.

And the patch wasn't needed anyway -- it was a patch to dead code.

-- Don


More information about the Cvs-libraries mailing list