patch applied (packages/X11): fill in Image routines in X11
(#982 from Frederik Eaton)
Duncan Coutts
duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Sun Nov 5 08:06:35 EST 2006
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 12:38 +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
> Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 11:37 schrieb Ross Paterson:
> > Fri Nov 3 02:35:59 PST 2006 Ross Paterson <ross at soi.city.ac.uk>
> > * fill in Image routines in X11 (#982 from Frederik Eaton)
> >
> > M ./Graphics/X11/Types.hsc +12
> > M ./Graphics/X11/Xlib/Misc.hsc -11 +7
> > M ./Graphics/X11/Xlib/Types.hsc -1 +9
> > M ./X11.cabal -1 +2
> > [...]
>
> FYI: I've made this patch compile by telling the X11 headers to use normal
> prototypes (not macros) for the image functions.
Good. Yeah, this issue of macros vs proper C functions is going to bite
us more if/when ghc moves away from compiling via C by default.
> In addition I have 3 remarks about the X11 package:
>
> * Strictly spoken, the majority of types are wrong: An Int is not a CInt,
> and the binding will fail on platforms where the actual representation is
> different. There should be a general code review of all the types in the
> "foreign import"s.
Yes, this will fail on most 64 bit machines where CInt is 32bit but Int
is 64bit.
> * The use of hsc2hs is not really needed, because the X11 prototypes and
> #defines are fixed for all eternity because of ABI issues. This situation is
> quite similar to OpenGL: There are different implementations, but they all
> have to agree on a single ABI.
Are there no structures with offsets etc? Those change between arches.
Duncan
More information about the Cvs-libraries
mailing list