cvs commit: fptools/libraries/base LICENSE

[Ross Paterson]

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 06:54:40AM -0700, Simon Marlow wrote:
> simonmar    2002/06/20 06:54:40 PDT
> 
>   Modified files:
>     libraries/base       LICENSE 
>   Log:
>   Add license from Andy Gill's HTML library

Except for capitalization, this is exactly the same licence that
Parsec is distributed under, i.e. BSD minus the non-endorsement clause.
Can we rationalize?  And doesn't copyright belong in the source file,
rather than the LICENSE file?  The way things are going, we could have
quite a lot of very similar licences in libraries/base/LICENSE.