making cabal-install into a library?
daniel.trstenjak at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 07:53:26 UTC 2015
> I think there are quite a few packages that make use of cabal-install and so
> yes better and safer to have a library then having always to call out to a
If you're using a subprocess, then you're always using the same, the installed
With a cabal-install library, your application might use an other
version of cabal-install than the installed cabal-install binary and
this might result into issues.
Also if it seems counterintuitive, the best solution might be to have
a library that usese a subprocess ;).
More information about the cabal-devel