Making cabal-install SSL capable

Michael Snoyman michael at snoyman.com
Tue Apr 28 14:11:37 UTC 2015


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:40 PM Gershom B <gershomb at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> In that case, perhaps we really should lean only towards the “shell out”
> solution. Or, I suppose, we could hide the ssl implementation behind a flag
> — but that feels rather awkward in comparison.
>
> So let’s try this: can anybody suggest any _downside_ to the “shell out”
> solution?
>
>
>
Since I wasn't explicit (and my comments could be read to say otherwise): I
am +1 on whatever approach ends up getting SSL support into cabal. If the
least problematic approach ends up being "shell out", I'm OK with it (I
even did that myself[1] in the distant past).

I believe that shelling out would work for uploading as well as
downloading, correct?

Michael

[1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/http-wget
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20150428/c759692d/attachment.html>


More information about the cabal-devel mailing list