Proposal: cabal-install: verify OpenPGP signatures

Nikita Karetnikov nikita at karetnikov.org
Sat Jun 21 15:56:05 UTC 2014


> If a package is signed, the maintainers have the permission to sign.  If
> it’s necessary to add a maintainer, the uploader lists a username in a
> file, signs it, and uploads.  (Is there a better way to achieve the same
> thing?)  The server checks the signature, parses the file, and adds the
> usernames to the maintainers group.

> Since it’s important to sign the file locally, there should be a
> convenience tool allowing to select the usernames.

This is too complicated and has some drawbacks.  I’m currently working
on the following:

1. It should be possible to upload a signature while uploading a
   package.  The server must check that the signature corresponds to the
   uploader’s key.

2. If it’s necessary to add a new maintainer, the initial uploader must
   sign the public key of the said maintainer.  (This will be checked by
   cabal-install.)

For ‘cabal-install’:

1. A warning must be raised if a package that was signed previously is
   not signed.

2. If a package is signed but was not signed previously, ‘cabal-install’
   must check its signature and add the public key to the cache.

3. If a package was signed but now is signed with a different key,
   ‘cabal-install’ must check whether this key is signed with the
   previously-known key corresponding to this package, then verify the
   signature.  If not, a warning must be raised.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20140621/62945e10/attachment.sig>


More information about the cabal-devel mailing list