Broken documentation on Hackage.
allbery.b at gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 14:33:19 UTC 2014
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Malcolm Wallace <malcolm.wallace at me.com>wrote:
> I think the fundamental problem is that Haddock is now built on top of
> ghc. So if a package cannot be built by ghc (for whatever reason, e.g.
> missing C library dependency), then it cannot be documented either. This
> is a good deal less than useful. A documentation generator ought to do a
> reasonable job, even if the code it is looking at is technically
> At work, we have a stand-alone documentation generator for Haskell, which
> requires no compiler. Haddock also was once stand-alone. I think it might
> be time to wind the clock backwards and retrieve this desirable property.
The problem with that was you didn't get documentation if you used any GHC
extension added within the past year or so. You can't win....
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cabal-devel