Unallocated names

[Bryan O'Sullivan]

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Ian Lynagh <ian at well-typed.com> wrote:

> Does anyone think that this check is currently useful, or should I just
> turn it off?
>

I think it should be turned off, or at most become a warning. There's no
particular rhyme or reason to the current naming hierarchy, so freezing it
in stone seems arbitrary.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20120911/4ca61f3f/attachment.htm>