Unallocated names

Leon Smith leon.p.smith at gmail.com
Wed Sep 5 12:09:31 CEST 2012

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Ross Paterson <ross at soi.city.ac.uk> wrote:
> That test is copied from Hackage1.  We don't have any means of allocating
> the module namespace apart from squatter's rights and negotiation,
> but arbitrary expansion of the top level of the hierarchy is unhelpful,
> and having a warning for that seems to me the least we should do.

Ok, I can agree to that,  but why did uploading postgresql-simple trigger a
warning, when all my modules start with Database?

Also,  should we consider adding the "Math" top-level name?  That seems to
be fairly popular...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20120905/6b1bbc3f/attachment.htm>

More information about the cabal-devel mailing list