Cabal and GHC
johan.tibell at gmail.com
Fri Nov 23 07:28:29 CET 2012
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> > So the invariant I suggest is
> > * If it'd work in an empty database, it should work in any non-empty one
> > * Installing X should never break the existing installation of Y
> This makes a lot of sense to me.
We've been working on this for some time and this property is sometimes
known as hermetic builds. The first approximation will be sandbox in (as it
is relatively easy to implement). Long term we want a write only Nix like
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cabal-devel