New cabal-install release (and schedule) needed
andres at well-typed.com
Mon Aug 27 23:12:06 CEST 2012
> We should bump the cabal-install package version to be the same as the Cabal
> package version, and increment both at the same time. It's deeply confusing
> to have the two out of sync.
Apart from 0 vs 1, this is already being done. I'm ok with bumping
cabal-install from 0.x to 1.x.
> I'd like to get rid of some old named branches that no longer have any
> value, e.g. cabal-1.2. Keeping tags around for a long time makes sense,
> branches do not.
Yes, I don't really see a problem there.
Andres Löh, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com
More information about the cabal-devel