"Cabal ignores ld-options?" - 2011 remix

[Ryan Newton]

Oops, I guess I misinterpreted "package description".  It did sound a little
dangerous ;-).

What you suggested also worked.  I'm in good shape now.

Thanks again,
   -Ryan

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Duncan Coutts <
duncan.coutts at googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:52 -0500, Ryan Newton wrote:
> > Victory!  Thanks!
> >
> > Well.. mostly victory ;-).  I've got it in a state where the .cabal
> > file rewriting works if "cabal configure" is called separately from
> > "cabal build/install" so that the latter reads the modified
> > configuration file.
>
> Yikes! Don't actually modify the .cabal file on disk. I meant just
> modify the data structure that gets passed around.
>
> > As for portability...  I'm afraid I don't personally do any
> > development on Windows.  Presumably the goal is for hackage packages
> > to work without requiring Cygwin/make/etc?
>
> Right.
>
> Duncan
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20110201/8dec58f1/attachment-0001.htm>