[Hackage] #454: file permissions of installed files on windows
Hackage
trac at galois.com
Wed Jan 28 09:23:23 EST 2009
#454: file permissions of installed files on windows
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: Toxaris | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Cabal-1.6
Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.6.0.1
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Difficulty: normal
Ghcversion: 6.10.1 | Platform: Windows
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by duncan):
Replying to [comment:8 Toxaris]:
Thanks for the details.
> I use a user account in the local administrator group. I have used a
administrator console to run the following tests (see #320).
> [...]
> All tests yielded identical results, namely:
>
> "c:\program files\Haskell\bin\hoogle.exe" was replaced by a file with no
permissions set for "all users", but permissions set for "administrators".
The file does not inherit the permissions set for "c:\program
files\Haskell\bin" (read and execute allowed for "all users").
So the interesting thing is why copying an .exe into `c:\program
files\Haskell\bin` does not create a file that inherits the permissions of
that directory. I think that is what I would have expected, or at least
hoped.
It is not surprising or problematic that when running cabal as
administrator that the `.exe` files generated are executable only by
administrator, however I was under the impression that when copying files,
the ACLs are not copied and the new file gets default permissions based on
the directory it is created in.
It turns out that the Haskell `copyFile` function does not copy
permissions (though it does try to, this turns out not to be effective on
Windows, which actually is what we want).
I'm interested in what happens when one creates an ordinary file in
`c:\program files\Haskell\bin` when running as the administrator user. For
example if one creates a simple `foo.txt` file, does that inherit the
permission read and execute allowed for "all users"? If so, is the same
true if we rename or copy `foo.txt`
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/454#comment:9>
Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/>
Hackage: Cabal and related projects
More information about the cabal-devel
mailing list