[Hackage] #418: 'cabal check' should warn about open lower bounds
Hackage
trac at galois.com
Sun Nov 30 23:09:41 EST 2008
#418: 'cabal check' should warn about open lower bounds
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: Saizan | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: cabal-install tool | Version: HEAD
Severity: normal | Keywords:
Difficulty: easy (<4 hours) | Ghcversion: 6.10.1
Platform: |
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Dependencies of the form "foo > x" don't really make sense given the
hackage version policy, since they exclude x but include x.y which is
supposed to have a similar api, and if you want something introduced in a
minor (or lesser) release you can explicitly mention that.
Also what is often intended with that notation is foo >= (x+1), causing
confusion.
I propose that we allow only closed lower bounds, i.e. foo >= x.
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/418>
Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/>
Hackage: Cabal and related projects
More information about the cabal-devel
mailing list