cabal-install uninstall ?

[Henrique Ferreiro García]

The problem I see is that each compiler dependent function has its own
post-install actions: GHC has stripExe, updateLibArchive..., Hugs has
setPermissions, etc.

Maybe, while this refactorization work isn't correctly done, a function
could be done to return the list of files to update and the post-install
function to execute, which could be a Maybe type associated with a
particular file or a group of files.

What do you think?

> Indeed. We would want to change the installLibs/installExe for each
> compiler to return a set of files to copy. We can do that without
> changing to use a proper compiler abstraction. They're independent
> problems
> 
> Duncan
> 
-- 
Henrique Ferreiro García <hferreiro at udc.es>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= unha parte de mensaxe asinada
	dixitalmente
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/attachments/20080522/6b96b069/attachment.bin