cabal-install uninstall ?
duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Tue May 6 05:56:17 EDT 2008
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 10:30 +0200, Benedikt Huber wrote:
> I appreciate ongoing work with cabal-install. I've tried the latest
> darcs version on a clean fresh ghc, and it worked fine.
> I wonder however, if there is any support (planned) for removing
> outdated packages. For example, when updating bytestring, I ended up
> with both xhtml-3000.0.2.1 and xhtml-3000.0.2.2 installed.
> Is there a something like a receipt, listing the files belonging to the
> installation of a package ? If there were such a thing (like copy
> --verbose, but machine readable), uninstalling a list of outdated
> packages would at least be possible.
> I wouldn't want cabal to remove outdated packages automatically, but
> some support for listing and removing them seems quite important to me.
So as you say, the way to do this would be to generate a list of files
that will be installed. This can be used to later uninstall.
If you want to work on this feature I can provide some advice on how to
implement it. It'll need a bit of work to restructure the install code
so that it actually produces a list of things to install, rather than
just installing them.
> Oh, and it would be nice if config fields like 'global-prefix' are
> mentioned in the README.
And indeed in comments in the config file itself.
> In the long term, in which way should cabal-install interact with
> package management tools like macports ? Is it supposed to be a
> replacement, an alternative or a complement ?
It's not 100% clear. It is certainly not a replacement and it cannot be
used to install other kinds of packages but it's also not realistic to
expect all hackage packages to be supplied by every distro so we really
have to aim for some kind of co-existance.
cabal-install is also primarily a per-user package manager, not
requiring any privileges to build and install packages. Most other
package managers are global.
> I thought about writing something similar as cabal-rpm for macports, but
> it seems better to have cabal-install handle dependency resolution and
> installation. Injecting a package into the pm's database after
> installing is imho the nicest solution. Does this make sense ?
What the best integration point is will depend on the package manager
and the features you want. If you want to be able to use the package
manager's dependency tracking then it has to go in at a higher level
than just recording what the installed files are.
More information about the cabal-devel