[Hackage] #225: allow installing just specific bits, like just docs
Hackage
trac at galois.com
Thu Jan 31 10:00:46 EST 2008
#225: allow installing just specific bits, like just docs
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: duncan | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.3.0
Severity: normal | Keywords:
Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2
Platform: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Sometimes people would like to build and install just part of a cabal
project, e.g. the documentation or one of the libraries or binaries.
Specific use-cases are packaging for OS distro's and generating Haddock
docs for code that was installed without it (cf the current state of
Debian-stable).
Igloo proposes the following user interface:
-----
As long as docs, license and binaries can be (de)selected individually I
don't really mind.
If you want a concrete suggestion, we could have `--foo` and `--no-foo`
for each thing, with the default being `--all` and the command line being
processed left-to-right, e.g.
{{{
cabal install --no-haddock-interfaces --docs --no-html
}}}
would install
* all (which wouldn't actually contain anything)
* docs (which wouldn't actually contain anything)
* haddock-interfaces
* license
* everything under binaries
-----
I broadly agree, but am slightly concerned there are dependencies amongst
the various things that his syntax does not respect (e.g. one may need to
install the libraries - e.g. one depending on a foreign library - in order
to get a binary working). So either we have to vet the command lines or
coarsen the flags. I hope Duncan and Igloo can draw on their packaging
experience and determine what is actually useful.
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/225>
Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/>
Hackage: Cabal and related projects
More information about the cabal-devel
mailing list