Let's play Name That Extension!
duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Sat Mar 31 02:10:27 EDT 2007
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:41 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> A large number of the newer GHC extensions have no cabal name. This
> is a very bad situation because if Hugs/yhc/etc were to gain support
> for (say) GADTs, it would not be possible to run cabal programs that
> require them, since the way programs specify dependency is with
> -fglasgow-exts. Also, what is the protocol for requesting cabal
> extension names?
You could do worse than to make up a sensible name and darcs send in
your patch to the Language.Haskell.Extension module to this list.
More information about the cabal-devel