Remove Setup.hs, use Setup.lhs only

[Lemmih]

On 11/27/06, Henning Thielemann <lemming at henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Isaac Jones wrote:
>
> > I anticipate some objections, because some people _hate_ .lhs, but we
> > can see how it goes; in that case, they could always use the
> > user-supplied field to tell cabal layered tools to use the
> > Setup.Foo.Hs or whatever the user wants.
>
> What about a separate binary, say 'cabal-setup', that calls
>   runhaskell Setup.hs
>  ?

Isn't that essentially what 'cabal-setup' is doing now?

-- 
Cheers,
  Lemmih