Remove Setup.hs, use Setup.lhs only
lemmih at gmail.com
Mon Nov 27 09:29:39 EST 2006
On 11/27/06, Henning Thielemann <lemming at henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Isaac Jones wrote:
> > I anticipate some objections, because some people _hate_ .lhs, but we
> > can see how it goes; in that case, they could always use the
> > user-supplied field to tell cabal layered tools to use the
> > Setup.Foo.Hs or whatever the user wants.
> What about a separate binary, say 'cabal-setup', that calls
> runhaskell Setup.hs
Isn't that essentially what 'cabal-setup' is doing now?
More information about the cabal-devel