Hello. some questions and suggestions
ross at soi.city.ac.uk
Wed Dec 27 20:06:16 EST 2006
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:07AM +0000, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 23:22 +0000, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> > Another advantage of Parsec is that then you'd be able to install a
> > Hugs package without passing the -98 flag every time. ReadP requires
> > forall, but Parsec doesn't unless you use the expression parser, which
> > I doubt Cabal would require.
> > This will also make it easier to do a Yhc port of Cabal.
> Actually I fixed that.
> The issue was that hugs's version of ReadP needed -98 and Cabal's
> 'compat' version didn't, so I just changed the ifdefs so that hugs
> always uses the compat implementation rather than it's own.
But this means that under Hugs (but not GHC) the parse functions exported
by Cabal can only be used with Distribution.Compat.ReadP, and can't be
combined with real ReadP parsers.
More information about the cabal-devel