[Haskell-beginners] pure instead of return?

[Francesco Ariis]

On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 07:47:57PM +0200, Silent Leaf wrote:
> [..] or is it a way to say "simplest way to wrap
> the value, purest (least "modified") equivalent of the value as wrapped
> value"?

^-- this one.

`pure` and `return` are synonyms. There are two words for the same concept
for historical reasons. Using pure does not incurs in monad constraints,
so if you can you might want to use that.