[Haskell-beginners] Converting a data type to an abstract data type

[amindfv at gmail.com]

The term you're looking for is "parameterized," not "abstract." An abstract data type is something else.

Can't help with your original question though, sorry!

tom


El Sep 14, 2015, a las 14:23, Ryan Warner <ryan.warner.mn+haskell at gmail.com> escribió:

> I had defined a data type similar to the following:
> 
> data Record = Record { name :: String, age :: Int }
> 
> Later, I realized I needed it be an ADT defined like:
> data Record a = Record { name :: String, age :: Int, resource :: a }
> 
> The change turned out to be fairly well contained and probably only took me a half hour to propagate up. However, I see the potential for this to be a bigger job. Are there any editors that automate that kind of refactoring?
> 
> -Ryan
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners