[Haskell-beginners] Cabal dependencies are per target or global?

[Karl Voelker]

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015, at 09:47 AM, Dimitri DeFigueiredo wrote:
> I don't like it, though. Having a build fail because of changes made to 
> another target is counter-intuitive to me. I don't understand your 
> argument for why the current behavior is a good thing. It seems we would 
> be extending so called "cabal hell" to within targets in a package if we 
> were to change this? I do wish there were other options here.

Yes, that's exactly right - it would be another way to end up in cabal
hell.

There is another option, though: you could put the executables in
separate packages.

-Karl