[Haskell-beginners] Foldable of Foldable
Tony Morris
tonymorris at gmail.com
Fri Jan 2 15:16:35 UTC 2015
A foldable of a foldable is itself foldable. That fact is expressed in
Control.Compose:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/TypeCompose-0.9.10/docs/Control-Compose.html
instance (Foldable g, Foldable f, Functor g) => Foldable (:. g f)
On 03/01/15 01:14, Julian Birch wrote:
> Apologies if this isn't clear, I suspect if I understood the
> terminology better I'd already have solved the problem. I've got a
> foldable of a foldable of a. (Specifically `[Set a]`) and I want to
> be able to express the concept that I can treat `(Foldable f1,
> Foldable f2) => f1 (f2 a)` as `f3 a` i.e. a foldable of a foldable of
> a can be newtyped to a foldable of a. At least, I think that's right.
>
> Sadly, my attempts at actually expressing this concept have met with
> incomprehension from GHC, could someone help me out, please?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julian.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/beginners/attachments/20150103/14ad04e3/attachment.html>
More information about the Beginners
mailing list