[Haskell-beginners] How do I use Guards in record syntax?
Dimitri DeFigueiredo
defigueiredo at ucdavis.edu
Mon Apr 14 18:36:08 UTC 2014
Thanks everyone :-)
I think the "case of" is what I was looking for. I keep thinking of
using "case of" as in pattern matching to find the "Shape" of the result
of an expression and of using guards to evaluate predicates. Forgetting
that True and False are constructors themselves. I just have to change
that mindset.
Cheers,
Dimitri
Em 14/04/14 09:04, Gesh escreveu:
> On April 14, 2014 9:03:20 AM GMT+03:00, Dimitri DeFigueiredo <defigueiredo at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>> I'm having some trouble understanding where I can or cannot use guards
>> inside record syntax. I'm writing a simple conversion routine, but I am
>>
>> not able to write it without inserting an extra let. Do I need a let
>> expression here? Am I missing something?
>>
>> --------------
>> data OldTrade = OldTrade {
>> oldprice :: Double ,
>> oldamount :: Double ,
>> oldbuysell :: String -- "buy", "sell" or ""
>> } deriving( Eq, Show)
>>
>>
>> data BuyOrSell = Buy | Sell | Unknown deriving(Eq, Show)
>>
>> data Trade = Trade {
>> price :: Double ,
>> amount :: Double ,
>> buysell :: BuyOrSell
>> } deriving( Eq, Show)
>>
>> convert :: OldTrade -> Trade
>>
>> convert ot = Trade { price = oldprice ot,
>> amount = oldamount ot,
>> buysell = let x | oldbuysell ot == "buy" = Buy
>> | oldbuysell ot == "sell" = Sell
>> | otherwise = Unknown
>> in x
>> }
>>
>> -- how do I eliminate the 'let' expression here?
>> -- I wanted to write something like:
>> --
>> -- buysell | oldbuysell ot == "buy" = Buy
>> -- | oldbuysell ot == "sell" = Sell
>> -- | otherwise = Unknown
>>
>> --------------
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Dimitri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Beginners mailing list
>> Beginners at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
> Note that this has nothing to do with record syntax specifically. Rather, what you're asking is how to write a multi-way if expression. Your way is to introduce a local binding using a let statement, which allows you to use pattern guards as you did.
> Usually, bowever, you'd use a case statement to avoid the binding. However, you could use the MultiWayIf LANGUAGE pragma, as suggested elsewhere in this thread. Or you could float out the binding to a where clause, except that doesn't seem to be what you're looking for.
> Hoping to help,
> Gesh
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
More information about the Beginners
mailing list