[Haskell-beginners] Searching for word in 2D array
Nathan Hüsken
nathan.huesken at posteo.de
Fri Mar 23 11:01:59 CET 2012
Firstly, Thanks!
I take from the both replies, to first create data-structures for
rows, columns and diagonals. That approach makes sense to me.
On 03/23/2012 01:21 AM, Ozgur Akgun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> import Data.List import qualified Data.Set as S
>
> rows :: Ord a => [[a]] -> S.Set [a] rows = S.fromList
>
> cols :: Ord a => [[a]] -> S.Set [a] cols = S.fromList . transpose
>
> diagonals :: Ord a => [[a]] -> S.Set [a] diagonals [] = S.empty
> diagonals xss = S.union ( S.fromList $ transpose (zipWith drop
> [0..] xss) ) ( diagonals (map init (tail xss)) )
>
> allWords :: Ord a => [[a]] -> S.Set [a] allWords xss = S.unions [
> rows xss , cols xss , diagonals xss , diagonals (map reverse xss)
> ]
>
> ... search :: Ord a => [a] -> [[a]] -> Bool search word xss = not $
> null [ () | xs <- S.toList (allWords xss), word `isPrefixOf` xs ]
>
If I understand correctly, in this solution it is assumed that that a
word must be a complete line (row column or diagonal), correct?
I was not clear in original mail, the word can also be in the middle
of line, but it seems easy enough to adjust the sample for this.
I do not understand why a set is used. Couldn't just a list be used
here, or is there some performance advantage I do not see?
I find it very difficult to estimate the performance of an haskell
program. The other solution of Lorenzo Bolla utilizes Data.Vector.
Does that give a performance advantage in this case?
Thanks!
Nathan
More information about the Beginners
mailing list