[Haskell-beginners] Haskell-style types in C or C++
Isaac Dupree
ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org
Mon Aug 1 02:51:15 CEST 2011
On 07/31/11 15:58, Ertugrul Soeylemez wrote:
> Unions work, too, but they are not nearly as clean. In general, avoid
> unions in C++, even though they seem to be a natural way to express
> ADTs. They really are not. Class hierarchies are the way to go.
Or boost::variant. It's actual algebraic data types, at the expense of
mighty weird syntax for pattern-matching because the Boost developers
had to come up with something that compiled in C++.
~Isaac
More information about the Beginners
mailing list