[arch-haskell] How cblrepo decides when to add 'haskell-' prefix?

[Taylor Hedberg]

I believe (though someone else may correct me here), that the "haskell-" is
only prepended to the package name if the package has a library component.
If the package comprises only executables, as in the case of yeganesh, then
it is left as-is.


On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Rafał Babinicz <rafal.babinicz at gmail.com>
wrote:

> After cloning habs repo,
> syncing hackage db with 'cblrepo sync'
> and adding yeganesh with 'cblrepo add --ghc-version=7.8.3-1 -u
> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/yeganesh-2.5/yeganesh.cabal'
> I see different behavior with 'cblrepo pkgbuild taffybar' and
> 'cblrepo pkgbuild yeganesh'.  Former one generates
> haskell-taffybar with adjusted PKGBUILD for that name, but latter
> generates regular 'yeganesh' without any haskell-yeganesh.
>
> I cannot find any important difference in cblrepo.db and also
> grepping through source code, I can't find any other references to
> taffybar than in cblrepo.db which looks similar to yeganesh's entry.
>
> Can you clarify in README of cblrepo or habs - how to generate
> haskell-* package?
>
> I've built xmobar and yeganesh with makeahpkg for x86_64 and i686
> and I want to contribute, but I'm totally lost here.
>
> Should I change names and PKBUILDS by hand? Why cblrepo pkgbuild
> generates different results for similar packages in cblrepo.db?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch-haskell mailing list
> arch-haskell at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/attachments/20140719/ad816fdf/attachment.html>