[arch-haskell] Haskell's state in Arch & near future

Magnus Therning magnus at therning.org
Sat Oct 12 07:39:36 UTC 2013

On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:22:54PM +0100, Peter Hercek wrote:
> I personally do not mind if we would move quicker than haskell
> platform. Though it means additional work so it is up to the
> maintainers.

The main problem with actually getting the speed we'd like is that the
speed of upstream developers is a limiting factor.  With each package
that is added to ArchHaskell we add yet another possible speed bump.
Finding a solution is tricky, since the only option that doesn't
require a lot of resources is dropping packages.

> Dropping all haskell packages from aur is a good idea. Maybe we
> should leave there only one "dummy" package which would point
> haskell newbies to a description how to get additional haskell
> packages which a archlinux user would expect to be in aur.

IIRC yaourt can install packages directly from hackage.  Is that still
the case?
If so I'll be more than happy to disown all AUR packages and close
down the arch-haskell account.


Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 
email: magnus at therning.org   jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have
C++ in mind.
     -- Alan Kay
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/attachments/20131012/375bc109/attachment.sig>

More information about the arch-haskell mailing list